Clinical Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2NT, UK.
Behav Res Ther. 2013 Sep;51(9):519-25. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jun 22.
Evidence-based cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for the eating disorders has an early focus on behavioural changes around food intake. However, patients' anxiety around such change might account for why they often seem unmotivated in treatment. In order to determine the impact of changing intake, this pilot study of patients with bulimic disorders (N = 19) or anorexia nervosa (N = 9) used a mixed quantitative and qualitative design to retrospectively examine their perspectives of the short- and long-term pros and cons of such change. As expected, change was seen negatively in the short-term (with particularly high numbers reporting anxiety), but there were few reports of long-term negative outcomes. In contrast, there were both short- and long-term benefits of changing eating. The patients described what was helpful in making changes and what they had learned as a result. In both cases, their descriptions mapped closely onto the content and process of evidence-based CBT for the eating disorders. Although there is a need for more extensive research, these findings suggest that patients (and therapists) might benefit from being aware of the contrast between the short- and the long-term pros and cons of changing eating within CBT for the eating disorders.
基于证据的认知行为疗法(CBT)在治疗饮食障碍时,早期重点在于改变与食物摄入相关的行为。然而,患者对这种改变的焦虑可能解释了为什么他们在治疗中似乎缺乏动力。为了确定改变摄入量的影响,这项针对贪食症患者(N=19)或厌食症患者(N=9)的初步研究采用了混合定量和定性设计,回顾性地检查了他们对这种改变的短期和长期利弊的看法。正如预期的那样,改变在短期内被视为负面的(报告焦虑的人数特别多),但很少有长期负面结果的报告。相比之下,改变饮食习惯既有短期也有长期的好处。患者描述了有助于改变的因素,以及他们因此学到的东西。在这两种情况下,他们的描述都与针对饮食障碍的基于证据的 CBT 的内容和过程密切相关。尽管需要进行更广泛的研究,但这些发现表明,在针对饮食障碍的 CBT 中,患者(和治疗师)可能会受益于意识到改变饮食习惯的短期和长期利弊之间的对比。