Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama, Box 870356, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0348, USA.
Pain Med. 2012 Jan;13(1):66-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01288.x. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
OBJECTIVE: The study sought to elucidate and refine the interpersonal, communicative dimension of the communal coping model (CCM) of catastrophizing. The primary aim was twofold. First, we examined the relations among pain intensity, catastrophizing, and pain behaviors as they function within the patient-health provider relationship. Second, we investigated the role of catastrophizing and pain behaviors in potentially influencing patient satisfaction with the provider, provider attitudes, and provider behavior. Mediation models were examined. DESIGN: The study was cross-sectional design with repeated measures. SETTING: This study was conducted at a university-based family medicine clinic and a private practice rheumatology clinic. Nineteen health providers and 49 chronic pain patients receiving treatment in a medical setting completed the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient outcome measures included pain intensity, catastrophizing, pain behaviors, and patient satisfaction with the provider. Health provider outcome measures were an assessment of provider attitudes and length of medical exam. RESULTS: The patient's level of catastrophizing entering the medical exam significantly predicted the interactive dynamics between the patient and the health provider during the exam and patient satisfaction after the exam. The patient's perceptions of pain and catastrophic thought processes may be interpersonally expressed to health providers via exaggerated pain behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Current findings indicate suggestions for refining the CCM. Results suggest that alleviation of catastrophic cognitions may facilitate more effective interpersonal communication within the patient-health provider relationship. Identification of those factors that improve patient-provider dynamics has important implications for the advancement of treatment for chronic pain and reducing the costs associated with persistent pain.
目的:本研究旨在阐明和完善灾难化的共通体应对模型(CCM)的人际、交际维度。主要目的有两个。首先,我们考察了疼痛强度、灾难化和疼痛行为在医患关系中的相互关系。其次,我们研究了灾难化和疼痛行为在潜在影响患者对提供者的满意度、提供者态度和提供者行为方面的作用。检验了中介模型。
设计:本研究为横断面设计,采用重复测量。
地点:本研究在一所大学的家庭医学诊所和一家私人实践风湿病诊所进行。19 名医疗服务提供者和 49 名在医疗环境中接受治疗的慢性疼痛患者完成了研究。
结果:患者的结局指标包括疼痛强度、灾难化、疼痛行为和对提供者的满意度。医疗服务提供者的结局指标包括提供者态度评估和医疗检查时间。
结论:目前的研究结果表明,需要对 CCM 进行进一步的细化。研究结果表明,减轻灾难性认知可能有助于在医患关系中更有效地进行人际沟通。识别那些改善医患动态的因素,对于推进慢性疼痛的治疗和减少与持续性疼痛相关的成本具有重要意义。
Pain Res Manag. 2014
Eur J Pers Cent Healthc. 2013