Gonçalves Mauro, Marques Nise R, Hallal Camilla Z, van Dieën Jaap H
Department of Physical Education, Bioscience Institute, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Brazil.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2011;24(4):209-14. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2011-0297.
Hand-held flexible poles which are brought into oscillation to cause alternating forces on trunk, are advocated as training devices that are supposed to solicit increased levels of stabilizing trunk muscle activity. The aim of this study was to verify this claim by comparing electromyographic (EMG) activity of trunk muscles during exercises performed with a flexible pole and a rigid pole.
Twelve healthy females performed three different exercises with flexible and rigid poles. EMG activity of iliocostalis lumborum (IL), multifidus (MU), rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO) and internal oblique (IO), and was continuously measured. The EMG signals were analyzed in time domain by calculation of the Root Mean Square (RMS) amplitudes over 250 ms windows. The mean RMS-values over time were normalized by the maximum RMS obtained for each muscle.
The IO showed a 72% greater EMG activity during the exercises performed with the flexible pole than with the rigid pole (p=0.035). In exercises performed in standing, the IO was significantly more active than when sitting (p=0.006).
As intended, the cyclic forces induced by the oscillating pole did increase trunk muscle activation. However, the effect was limited and significant for the IO muscle only.
手持柔性杆使其振荡以在躯干上产生交变力,被提倡作为一种训练器械,旨在引发更高水平的躯干肌肉稳定活动。本研究的目的是通过比较使用柔性杆和刚性杆进行运动时躯干肌肉的肌电图(EMG)活动来验证这一说法。
12名健康女性分别使用柔性杆和刚性杆进行三种不同的运动。连续测量腰髂肋肌(IL)、多裂肌(MU)、腹直肌(RA)、腹外斜肌(EO)和腹内斜肌(IO)的EMG活动。通过计算250毫秒窗口内的均方根(RMS)幅度在时域中分析EMG信号。随时间的平均RMS值通过各肌肉获得的最大RMS进行归一化。
在使用柔性杆进行运动时,IO的EMG活动比使用刚性杆时高72%(p = 0.035)。在站立位进行的运动中,IO的活动明显比坐位时更活跃(p = 0.006)。
如预期的那样,振荡杆产生的循环力确实增加了躯干肌肉的激活。然而,这种效果是有限的,仅对IO肌肉有显著影响。