Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚心理健康法庭——权利、保护、治疗和治理的“空间”?

Australian mental health tribunals--'Space' for rights, protection, treatment and governance?

机构信息

Faculty of Law, University of Sydney, Eastern Avenue, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2012 Jan-Feb;35(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.11.002. Epub 2011 Dec 3.

Abstract

This paper draws on a multi-year Australian collaborative study of mental health review tribunals ('MHTs') in three jurisdictions (Victoria, New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory) undertaken in conjunction with the NSW Law and Justice Foundation, using qualitative and quantitative methods to examine the role of MHTs in advancing goals such as fairness, legality and access to treatment. Study findings regarding stakeholder and client concerns - about access to quality treatment and associated support services, review of treatment adequacy and drug regimes, and their 'participation' or dignity of engagement in review processes - are presented as variants of the need for adequate hearing 'space': temporal, jurisdictional, cognate/relational, physical and symbolic, and 'connective'. Building on earlier arguments for MHTs to engage not only legal, but also clinical and social domains, and for adopting some processes more characteristic of case-conferencing, this paper examines the implications of tribunal 'flexibility' and a wider overall 'governance' jurisdiction in mental health.

摘要

本文借鉴了澳大利亚一项为期多年的、针对三个司法管辖区(维多利亚州、新南威尔士州和澳大利亚首都领地)心理健康审查法庭(“MHTs”)的联合研究,该研究由新南威尔士州法律与司法基金会资助,采用定性和定量方法来考察 MHTs 在推进公平、合法性和获得治疗等目标方面的作用。研究结果涉及利益相关者和客户的关切——关于获得高质量治疗和相关支持服务、审查治疗的充分性和药物治疗方案,以及他们在审查过程中的“参与”或尊严——被呈现为充分听证“空间”的需要的变体:时间、司法、同源/关系、物理和象征性,以及“连接性”。本文基于先前的论点,即 MHTs 不仅要参与法律领域,还要参与临床和社会领域,并采用一些更具案例会议特征的程序,考察了法庭“灵活性”和更广泛的心理健康“治理”管辖权的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验