Limb Lengthening and Complex Reconstruction Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Apr;470(4):1221-31. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2204-4. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
Lengthening over a nail and internal lengthening nails have been developed to minimize or eliminate patients' time wearing a frame during femur lengthening. However it is unclear whether either of these two approaches results in faster times to union or fewer complications over the other.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked which technique better achieved: (1) the lengthening goals, (2) the distraction rate control, (3) quality of the regenerate bone, (4) fewer complications, and (5) if SF-36 scores and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Lower Limb Module (AAOS LLM) scores differ in each treatment modality?
We retrospectively reviewed the records and radiographs of 11 patients who had 12 Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor (ISKD) procedures between 2002 and 2005, and 21 patients with 22 femoral lengthenings performed as lengthening over nail procedures between 2005 and 2009. Details such as leg length discrepancies, operative time, time of removal of the external fixator or ISKD, and any complications encountered were recorded. SF-36 and AAOS LLM scores also were compiled. The minimum followups for the ISKD and the lengthening over nail cohorts were 62 months (average, 76 months; range, 62-93 months) and 13 months (average, 27 months; range, 13-38 months), respectively.
We observed no difference in achieving the lengthening goals between the two procedures. Distraction was not well controlled in the ISKD group; the distraction rates were 1.7 mm per day for the fast group (distraction rate greater than 1 mm/day) and 0.84 mm per day for the slow group (less than 1 mm/day). The lengthening over nail group had an average distraction rate of 0.88 mm per day. One of 20 of the patients who had lengthening over a nail had complications requiring additional unanticipated surgeries whereas six of 12 patients who had femoral lengthening in the ISKD group had such complications.
Based on our observations, we believe the lengthening over nail technique for femoral lengthening is associated with fewer complications than the ISKD.
Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
为了尽量减少或消除患者在股骨延长过程中佩戴框架的时间,已经开发出了过钉延长和内置延长钉技术。然而,目前尚不清楚这两种方法中哪一种能更快地实现愈合,或者哪一种方法并发症更少。
问题/目的:我们想知道哪种技术更好地实现了:(1)延长目标,(2)控制牵伸率,(3)再生骨的质量,(4)减少并发症,以及(5)如果 SF-36 评分和美国矫形外科医师学会下肢模块(AAOS LLM)评分在每种治疗方式中存在差异?
我们回顾性分析了 2002 年至 2005 年期间接受 12 例髓内骨骼动力式牵伸器(ISKD)手术的 11 例患者和 2005 年至 2009 年期间接受 22 例股骨延长过钉手术的 21 例患者的病历和影像学资料。记录了肢体长度差异、手术时间、外固定器或 ISKD 的去除时间以及遇到的任何并发症等细节。还汇编了 SF-36 和 AAOS LLM 评分。ISKD 和延长过钉两组的最低随访时间分别为 62 个月(平均 76 个月;范围 62-93 个月)和 13 个月(平均 27 个月;范围 13-38 个月)。
我们观察到两种手术在实现延长目标方面没有差异。ISKD 组的牵伸控制不理想;快组的牵伸率为 1.7 毫米/天(牵伸率大于 1 毫米/天),慢组为 0.84 毫米/天(小于 1 毫米/天)。延长过钉组的平均牵伸率为 0.88 毫米/天。12 例 ISKD 股骨延长患者中有 1 例需要额外的意外手术治疗并发症,20 例股骨延长过钉患者中有 6 例出现并发症。
根据我们的观察,我们认为股骨延长过钉技术与 ISKD 相比,并发症更少。
III 级,治疗研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者指南。