Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Jan;21(1):134-47. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0775. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
Previously, small studies have found that BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast tumors differ in their pathology. Analysis of larger datasets of mutation carriers should allow further tumor characterization.
We used data from 4,325 BRCA1 and 2,568 BRCA2 mutation carriers to analyze the pathology of invasive breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancers.
There was strong evidence that the proportion of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast tumors decreased with age at diagnosis among BRCA1 (P-trend = 1.2 × 10(-5)), but increased with age at diagnosis among BRCA2, carriers (P-trend = 6.8 × 10(-6)). The proportion of triple-negative tumors decreased with age at diagnosis in BRCA1 carriers but increased with age at diagnosis of BRCA2 carriers. In both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, ER-negative tumors were of higher histologic grade than ER-positive tumors (grade 3 vs. grade 1; P = 1.2 × 10(-13) for BRCA1 and P = 0.001 for BRCA2). ER and progesterone receptor (PR) expression were independently associated with mutation carrier status [ER-positive odds ratio (OR) for BRCA2 = 9.4, 95% CI: 7.0-12.6 and PR-positive OR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.3-2.3, under joint analysis]. Lobular tumors were more likely to be BRCA2-related (OR for BRCA2 = 3.3, 95% CI: 2.4-4.4; P = 4.4 × 10(-14)), and medullary tumors BRCA1-related (OR for BRCA2 = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.18-0.35; P = 2.3 × 10(-15)). ER-status of the first breast cancer was predictive of ER-status of asynchronous contralateral breast cancer (P = 0.0004 for BRCA1; P = 0.002 for BRCA2). There were no significant differences in ovarian cancer morphology between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers (serous: 67%; mucinous: 1%; endometrioid: 12%; clear-cell: 2%). CONCLUSIONS/IMPACT: Pathologic characteristics of BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors may be useful for improving risk-prediction algorithms and informing clinical strategies for screening and prophylaxis.
先前的小型研究发现,BRCA1 和 BRCA2 乳腺癌在病理学上存在差异。对携带突变的更大数据集的分析应该可以进一步对肿瘤进行特征描述。
我们使用了来自 4325 名 BRCA1 突变携带者和 2568 名 BRCA2 突变携带者的数据,分析了浸润性乳腺癌、卵巢癌和对侧乳腺癌的病理学特征。
有强有力的证据表明,BRCA1 携带者中,雌激素受体(ER)阴性乳腺癌的比例随着诊断时年龄的增加而降低(趋势 P 值=1.2×10(-5)),但 BRCA2 携带者中则随着诊断时年龄的增加而增加(趋势 P 值=6.8×10(-6))。三阴性肿瘤的比例在 BRCA1 携带者中随着诊断年龄的增加而降低,但在 BRCA2 携带者中则随着诊断年龄的增加而增加。在 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 携带者中,ER 阴性肿瘤的组织学分级均高于 ER 阳性肿瘤(3 级比 1 级;BRCA1 的 P 值=1.2×10(-13),BRCA2 的 P 值=0.001)。ER 和孕激素受体(PR)的表达与突变携带者状态独立相关[BRCA2 中 ER 阳性的优势比(OR)为 9.4,95%CI:7.0-12.6,PR 阳性 OR 为 1.7,95%CI:1.3-2.3,联合分析]。小叶肿瘤更可能与 BRCA2 相关(BRCA2 的 OR=3.3,95%CI:2.4-4.4;P=4.4×10(-14)),而髓样肿瘤则与 BRCA1 相关(BRCA2 的 OR=0.25,95%CI:0.18-0.35;P=2.3×10(-15))。首次乳腺癌的 ER 状态可预测对侧乳腺癌的 ER 状态(BRCA1 的 P 值=0.0004;BRCA2 的 P 值=0.002)。BRCA1 和 BRCA2 携带者的卵巢癌形态学无显著差异(浆液性:67%;黏液性:1%;子宫内膜样:12%;透明细胞:2%)。
结论/意义:BRCA1 和 BRCA2 肿瘤的病理学特征可用于改进风险预测算法,并为筛查和预防提供信息。