Moeller Korbinian, Martignon Laura, Wessolowski Silvia, Engel Joachim, Nuerk Hans-Christoph
Knowledge Media Research Center Tuebingen, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2011 Nov 29;2:328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00328. eCollection 2011.
Children typically learn basic numerical and arithmetic principles using finger-based representations. However, whether or not reliance on finger-based representations is beneficial or detrimental is the subject of an ongoing debate between researchers in neurocognition and mathematics education. From the neurocognitive perspective, finger counting provides multisensory input, which conveys both cardinal and ordinal aspects of numbers. Recent data indicate that children with good finger-based numerical representations show better arithmetic skills and that training finger gnosis, or "finger sense," enhances mathematical skills. Therefore neurocognitive researchers conclude that elaborate finger-based numerical representations are beneficial for later numerical development. However, research in mathematics education recommends fostering mentally based numerical representations so as to induce children to abandon finger counting. More precisely, mathematics education recommends first using finger counting, then concrete structured representations and, finally, mental representations of numbers to perform numerical operations. Taken together, these results reveal an important debate between neurocognitive and mathematics education research concerning the benefits and detriments of finger-based strategies for numerical development. In the present review, the rationale of both lines of evidence will be discussed.
儿童通常使用基于手指的表征来学习基本的数字和算术原理。然而,对基于手指的表征的依赖是有益还是有害,这是神经认知和数学教育领域的研究人员正在进行的一场辩论的主题。从神经认知的角度来看,手指计数提供了多感官输入,它传达了数字的基数和序数方面。最近的数据表明,具有良好的基于手指的数字表征的儿童表现出更好的算术技能,并且训练手指识别能力,即“手指感觉”,可以提高数学技能。因此,神经认知研究人员得出结论,精心构建的基于手指的数字表征对后期的数字发展有益。然而,数学教育领域的研究建议培养基于心理的数字表征,以便促使儿童放弃手指计数。更确切地说,数学教育建议首先使用手指计数,然后是具体的结构化表征,最后是数字的心理表征来进行数值运算。综上所述,这些结果揭示了神经认知和数学教育研究之间关于基于手指的策略对数字发展的利弊的一场重要辩论。在本综述中,将讨论这两条证据线的基本原理。