Goodney Philip P, Travis Lori L, Nallamothu Brahmajee K, Holman Kerianne, Suckow Bjoern, Henke Peter K, Lucas F Lee, Goodman David C, Birkmeyer John D, Fisher Elliott S
Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Jan;5(1):94-102. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.962233. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
Many believe that variation in vascular practice may affect limb salvage rates in patients with severe peripheral arterial disease. However, the extent of variation in procedural vascular care obtained by patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) remains unknown.
By using Medicare 2003 to 2006 data, we identified all patients with CLI who underwent major lower extremity amputation in the 306 hospital referral regions described in the Dartmouth Atlas of Healthcare. For each patient, we studied the use of lower extremity vascular procedures (open surgery or endovascular intervention) in the year before amputation. Our main outcome measure was the intensity of vascular care, defined as the proportion of patients in the hospital referral region undergoing a vascular procedure in the year before amputation. Overall, 20,464 patients with CLI underwent major lower extremity amputations during the study period, and collectively underwent 25,800 vascular procedures in the year before undergoing amputation. However, these procedures were not distributed evenly: 54% of patients had no vascular procedures performed in the year before amputation, 14% underwent 1 vascular procedure, and 32% underwent >1 vascular procedure. In the regions in the lowest quintile of vascular intensity, vascular procedures were performed in 32% of patients. Conversely, in the regions in the highest quintile of vascular intensity, revascularization was performed in 58% of patients in the year before amputation (P<0.0001). In analyses accounting for differences in age, sex, race, and comorbidities, patients in high-intensity regions were 2.4 times as likely to undergo revascularization in the year before amputation than patients in low-intensity regions (adjusted odds ratio, 2.4; 95% CI, 2.1-2.6; P<0.001).
Significant variation exists in the intensity of vascular care provided to patients in the year before major amputation. In some regions, patients receive intensive care, whereas in other regions, far less vascular care is provided. Future work is needed to determine the association between intensity of vascular care and limb salvage.
许多人认为血管治疗方法的差异可能会影响严重外周动脉疾病患者的肢体挽救率。然而,严重肢体缺血(CLI)患者所接受的血管治疗程序的差异程度仍不明确。
利用2003年至2006年医疗保险数据,我们在《达特茅斯医疗保健地图集》中描述的306个医院转诊区域内,确定了所有接受主要下肢截肢手术的CLI患者。对于每位患者,我们研究了截肢前一年下肢血管手术(开放手术或血管内介入治疗)的使用情况。我们的主要结局指标是血管治疗强度,定义为医院转诊区域内截肢前一年接受血管手术的患者比例。总体而言,在研究期间,20464例CLI患者接受了主要下肢截肢手术,在截肢前一年共接受了25800例血管手术。然而,这些手术分布并不均匀:54%的患者在截肢前一年未接受血管手术,14%的患者接受了1次血管手术,32%的患者接受了超过1次血管手术。在血管治疗强度最低的五分之一区域,32%的患者接受了血管手术。相反,在血管治疗强度最高的五分之一区域,58%的患者在截肢前一年接受了血运重建(P<0.0001)。在考虑年龄、性别、种族和合并症差异的分析中,高强度区域的患者在截肢前一年接受血运重建的可能性是低强度区域患者的2.4倍(调整后的优势比为2.4;95%可信区间为2.1-2.6;P<0.001)。
在主要截肢手术前一年,为患者提供的血管治疗强度存在显著差异。在一些地区,患者接受强化治疗,而在其他地区,提供的血管治疗则少得多。需要进一步的研究来确定血管治疗强度与肢体挽救之间的关联。