• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: is there a preferred route to the heart?

作者信息

Meier Pascal, Windecker Stephan, Lansky Alexandra J

出版信息

Heart. 2012 Feb;98(4):269-70. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301225. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301225
PMID:22147901
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: is there a preferred route to the heart?经桡动脉与经股动脉途径用于直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗：通往心脏是否存在更佳途径？
Heart. 2012 Feb;98(4):269-70. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301225. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
2
Access site selection for primary PCI: the evidence for transradial access is strong.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的穿刺部位选择：经桡动脉穿刺的证据充分。
Heart. 2012 Sep;98(18):1392; author reply 1392-3. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-301935. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
3
Influence of access site selection on PCI-related adverse events in patients with STEMI: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（PCI）相关不良事件与梗死相关动脉（IRA）入路选择的关系：随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Heart. 2012 Feb;98(4):303-11. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300558. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
4
Reperfusion Times for Radial Versus Femoral Access in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Observations From the Cardiac Care Network Provincial Primary PCI Registry.接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经桡动脉与股动脉途径的再灌注时间：来自心脏护理网络省级直接PCI注册研究的观察结果
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 May;8(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002097.
5
Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.冠状动脉造影或介入治疗中桡动脉与股动脉入路及其对大出血和缺血事件的影响：随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Am Heart J. 2009 Jan;157(1):132-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.023. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
6
Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经桡动脉与股动脉入路行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的随机对照试验的荟萃分析
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):814-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.010.
7
Primary angioplasty in the ACCEPT registry: Why has it been difficult to accept and implement the radial artery access as preferential?ACCEPT注册研究中的直接血管成形术：为何难以接受并将桡动脉入路作为首选实施？
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014 Oct;103(4):268-71. doi: 10.5935/abc.20140154.
8
Transradial access for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the next standard of care?经桡动脉入路行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗：下一个治疗标准？
Heart. 2010 Sep;96(17):1341-4. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.196824.
9
A comparison of abciximab and small-molecule glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of contemporary randomized controlled trials.比较直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中应用阿昔单抗与小分子糖蛋白Ⅱb/Ⅲa 抑制剂的疗效：当代随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jun;2(3):230-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.847996. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
10
Safety and efficacy of transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.急性心肌梗死经桡动脉与经股动脉行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性和有效性：随机试验的荟萃分析
Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Jun;23(4):284-93. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283526a9d.

引用本文的文献

1
Almanac 2013: acute coronary syndromes.2013 年日历：急性冠脉综合征。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2014 Mar;126(5-6):176-83. doi: 10.1007/s00508-014-0526-4.