Department of Orthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics, Indiana University School of Dentistry, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Angle Orthod. 2012 Jul;82(4):723-31. doi: 10.2319/070511-431.1. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
To determine whether clinical variables associated with surgically exposed unilateral maxillary impacted canine cases are predictors for orthodontic treatment choices involving (1) extraction, (2) expansion, (3) extraction and expansion, or (4) nonextraction and nonexpansion.
A retrospective study of records of 97 cases meeting the inclusion criteria with unilateral maxillary impacted canines from three private practices were reviewed for gender, age, molar classification, impaction location and angulation, and presence of pretreatment maxillary and mandibular casts and cephalograms. Maxillary and mandibular transverse dimensions and lower incisor crowding were obtained from occlusal cast images using custom computer software. Skeletal analysis and incisor angulation and position were obtained from digitized cephalometric tracings. Statistical comparisons were made to determine parameters orthodontists could use to develop an orthodontic treatment plan.
Subjects with Class II end-on molars on the nonaffected side were less likely to have extraction and/or expansion. Subjects with extraction and/or expansion had decreased lower incisor to mandibular plane, available canine space, maxillary premolars, and molar transverse dimensions and an increased mandibular incisor Irregularity Index compared with nonextraction/nonexpansion subjects. Using a multiple-variable model, available canine space was the single most important predictor of extraction and/or expansion, followed by maxillary molar transverse dimension and mandibular incisor Irregularity Index.
Available canine space, maxillary transverse dimension at the molars, and the mandibular incisor Irregularity Index serve as indicators for extraction and/or expansion in cases involving unilateral maxillary impacted canines requiring surgical exposure. Many of these cases are treated without extraction and/or expansion.
确定与手术暴露的单侧上颌埋伏尖牙病例相关的临床变量是否可预测涉及(1)拔牙、(2)扩弓、(3)拔牙加扩弓或(4)不拔牙不扩弓的正畸治疗选择。
对三家私人诊所中符合纳入标准的 97 例单侧上颌埋伏尖牙病例的记录进行了回顾性研究,这些病例的性别、年龄、磨牙分类、埋伏位置和角度、是否存在治疗前的上颌和下颌模型及头颅侧位片。使用定制的计算机软件从咬合模型的图像中获取上颌和下颌横向尺寸以及下切牙拥挤度。从数字化头影测量轨迹中获得骨骼分析、切牙角度和位置。进行了统计学比较,以确定正畸医生可以用来制定正畸治疗计划的参数。
非受累侧为第二类近中错颌的患者不太可能进行拔牙和/或扩弓。与不拔牙不扩弓的患者相比,进行拔牙和/或扩弓的患者的下颌平面到下切牙距离、可用的尖牙间隙、上颌前磨牙和磨牙的横向尺寸以及下颌切牙不整齐指数减小。使用多变量模型,可用的尖牙间隙是拔牙和/或扩弓的唯一最重要的预测因素,其次是上颌磨牙的横向尺寸和下颌切牙不整齐指数。
对于需要手术暴露的单侧上颌埋伏尖牙病例,可用的尖牙间隙、上颌磨牙的横向尺寸和下颌切牙不整齐指数可作为拔牙和/或扩弓的指标。许多此类病例无需拔牙和/或扩弓治疗。