Business Analytics and Mathematical Sciences, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA.
Risk Anal. 2012 May;32(5):894-915. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01713.x. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
Recent large-scale terrorist attacks have raised interest in models for resource allocation against terrorist threats. The unifying theme in this area is the need to develop methods for the analysis of allocation decisions when risks stem from the intentional actions of intelligent adversaries. Most approaches to these problems have a game-theoretic flavor although there are also several interesting decision-analytic-based proposals. One of them is the recently introduced framework for adversarial risk analysis, which deals with decision-making problems that involve intelligent opponents and uncertain outcomes. We explore how adversarial risk analysis addresses some standard counterterrorism models: simultaneous defend-attack models, sequential defend-attack-defend models, and sequential defend-attack models with private information. For each model, we first assess critically what would be a typical game-theoretic approach and then provide the corresponding solution proposed by the adversarial risk analysis framework, emphasizing how to coherently assess a predictive probability model of the adversary's actions, in a context in which we aim at supporting decisions of a defender versus an attacker. This illustrates the application of adversarial risk analysis to basic counterterrorism models that may be used as basic building blocks for more complex risk analysis of counterterrorism problems.
最近发生的大规模恐怖袭击事件引起了人们对针对恐怖威胁的资源分配模型的兴趣。这一领域的一个统一主题是需要开发分析分配决策的方法,当风险源于智能对手的故意行为时。这些问题的大多数方法都具有博弈论的特点,尽管也有一些基于决策分析的有趣建议。其中之一是最近提出的对抗风险分析框架,它处理涉及智能对手和不确定结果的决策问题。我们探讨了对抗风险分析如何解决一些标准的反恐模型:同时防御攻击模型、顺序防御攻击防御模型和具有私人信息的顺序防御攻击模型。对于每个模型,我们首先批判性地评估什么是典型的博弈论方法,然后提供对抗风险分析框架提出的相应解决方案,强调如何在旨在支持防御者与攻击者之间决策的背景下,一致地评估对手行为的预测概率模型。这说明了对抗风险分析在基本反恐模型中的应用,这些模型可以作为更复杂的反恐问题风险分析的基本构建块。