Suppr超能文献

诊断能力的定量评估。

Quantitative assessment of diagnostic ability.

作者信息

Bordage G, Grant J, Marsden P

机构信息

Postgraduate Medical Centre, Greenwich District Hospital, London.

出版信息

Med Educ. 1990 Sep;24(5):413-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1990.tb02650.x.

Abstract

This paper describes variables critical to diagnostic thinking that are based on research by Bordage and Grant & Marsden on the diagnostic thinking of medical students and experienced doctors. The purpose of the study is to use their findings to develop an inventory of diagnostic thinking. A 56-item diagnostic thinking inventory was initially developed; each item contains a stem followed by a 6-point, semantic differential scale. The inventory is designed to measure two aspects of diagnostic thinking: the degree of flexibility in thinking and the degree of knowledge structure in memory. The specific goal of the study is to determine which items discriminate best between weaker and stronger diagnosticians and to reduce the inventory to only those items which significantly contribute to the overall score. Thirty subjects from nine groups, each representing a distinct phase of medical education and clinical practice, participated, namely first- and third-year clinical medical students, house officers, senior house officers, registrars, senior registrars, consultants, trainees in general practice, and general practitioners, all from the UK (n = 270). Discrimination indices were calculated for each item. The revised version of the inventory contains 41 items. All the subjects found the exercise meaningful and the resulting scores showed variance and discrimination. The inventory will eventually be used to assess individual student's and clinician's diagnostic thinking and to plan ways of improving their diagnostic thinking.

摘要

本文描述了对诊断思维至关重要的变量,这些变量基于博尔达热以及格兰特和马斯登对医学生和经验丰富的医生诊断思维的研究。该研究的目的是利用他们的研究结果编制一份诊断思维量表。最初编制了一份包含56个条目的诊断思维量表;每个条目都有一个题干,后面跟着一个6级语义差异量表。该量表旨在衡量诊断思维的两个方面:思维的灵活程度和记忆中的知识结构程度。该研究的具体目标是确定哪些条目在较弱和较强的诊断者之间具有最佳区分度,并将量表缩减为仅那些对总分有显著贡献的条目。来自九个组的30名受试者参与了研究,每个组代表医学教育和临床实践的一个不同阶段,即一年级和三年级临床医学学生、住院医师、高级住院医师、专科住院医师、高级专科住院医师、顾问医生、全科实习医生和全科医生,均来自英国(n = 270)。计算了每个条目的区分指数。该量表的修订版包含41个条目。所有受试者都认为这项练习很有意义,所得分数显示出差异和区分度。该量表最终将用于评估个体学生和临床医生的诊断思维,并规划改善他们诊断思维的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验