• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊断能力的定量评估。

Quantitative assessment of diagnostic ability.

作者信息

Bordage G, Grant J, Marsden P

机构信息

Postgraduate Medical Centre, Greenwich District Hospital, London.

出版信息

Med Educ. 1990 Sep;24(5):413-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1990.tb02650.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1990.tb02650.x
PMID:2215294
Abstract

This paper describes variables critical to diagnostic thinking that are based on research by Bordage and Grant & Marsden on the diagnostic thinking of medical students and experienced doctors. The purpose of the study is to use their findings to develop an inventory of diagnostic thinking. A 56-item diagnostic thinking inventory was initially developed; each item contains a stem followed by a 6-point, semantic differential scale. The inventory is designed to measure two aspects of diagnostic thinking: the degree of flexibility in thinking and the degree of knowledge structure in memory. The specific goal of the study is to determine which items discriminate best between weaker and stronger diagnosticians and to reduce the inventory to only those items which significantly contribute to the overall score. Thirty subjects from nine groups, each representing a distinct phase of medical education and clinical practice, participated, namely first- and third-year clinical medical students, house officers, senior house officers, registrars, senior registrars, consultants, trainees in general practice, and general practitioners, all from the UK (n = 270). Discrimination indices were calculated for each item. The revised version of the inventory contains 41 items. All the subjects found the exercise meaningful and the resulting scores showed variance and discrimination. The inventory will eventually be used to assess individual student's and clinician's diagnostic thinking and to plan ways of improving their diagnostic thinking.

摘要

本文描述了对诊断思维至关重要的变量,这些变量基于博尔达热以及格兰特和马斯登对医学生和经验丰富的医生诊断思维的研究。该研究的目的是利用他们的研究结果编制一份诊断思维量表。最初编制了一份包含56个条目的诊断思维量表;每个条目都有一个题干,后面跟着一个6级语义差异量表。该量表旨在衡量诊断思维的两个方面:思维的灵活程度和记忆中的知识结构程度。该研究的具体目标是确定哪些条目在较弱和较强的诊断者之间具有最佳区分度,并将量表缩减为仅那些对总分有显著贡献的条目。来自九个组的30名受试者参与了研究,每个组代表医学教育和临床实践的一个不同阶段,即一年级和三年级临床医学学生、住院医师、高级住院医师、专科住院医师、高级专科住院医师、顾问医生、全科实习医生和全科医生,均来自英国(n = 270)。计算了每个条目的区分指数。该量表的修订版包含41个条目。所有受试者都认为这项练习很有意义,所得分数显示出差异和区分度。该量表最终将用于评估个体学生和临床医生的诊断思维,并规划改善他们诊断思维的方法。

相似文献

1
Quantitative assessment of diagnostic ability.诊断能力的定量评估。
Med Educ. 1990 Sep;24(5):413-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1990.tb02650.x.
2
A cohort study for the development and validation of a reflective inventory to quantify diagnostic reasoning skills in optometry practice.一项队列研究,旨在开发和验证一个反映性清单,以量化在验光实践中诊断推理技能。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 11;22(1):536. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03493-6.
3
Assessment of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Thinking among Dental Students.牙科学生临床推理与诊断思维的评估
Int J Dent. 2022 Sep 26;2022:1085326. doi: 10.1155/2022/1085326. eCollection 2022.
4
Web-Enabled Mechanistic Case Diagramming: A Novel Tool for Assessing Students' Ability to Integrate Foundational and Clinical Sciences.基于网络的机制案例绘图:评估学生整合基础科学和临床科学能力的新工具
Acad Med. 2018 Aug;93(8):1146-1149. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002184.
5
The structure of memorized knowledge in students and clinicians: an explanation for diagnostic expertise.学生和临床医生记忆知识的结构:对诊断专业技能的一种解释。
Med Educ. 1987 Mar;21(2):92-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb00672.x.
6
Influence of critical thinking disposition on the learning efficiency of problem-based learning in undergraduate medical students.批判性思维倾向对本科医学生基于问题学习的学习效率的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 3;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1418-5.
7
Doctors' attitudes and confidence towards providing nutrition care in practice: Comparison of New Zealand medical students, general practice registrars and general practitioners.医生在实际工作中提供营养护理的态度和信心:新西兰医科学生、全科实习医生和全科医生的比较。
J Prim Health Care. 2015 Sep 1;7(3):244-50.
8
Evaluation Of Development Of Clinical Reasoning Skills In Dental Students Through Diagnostic Thinking Inventory.通过诊断思维量表评价牙科学学生临床推理技能的发展。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2023 Sep;73(9):1843-1846. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.8010.
9
Qualitative differences in knowledge structure are associated with diagnostic performance in medical students.知识结构的定性差异与医学生的诊断表现有关。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 Dec;14(5):677-84. doi: 10.1007/s10459-008-9149-8. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
10
Functional neuroimaging correlates of thinking flexibility and knowledge structure in memory: Exploring the relationships between clinical reasoning and diagnostic thinking.记忆中思维灵活性与知识结构的功能性神经影像学关联:探索临床推理与诊断思维之间的关系。
Med Teach. 2016 Jun;38(6):570-7. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1047755. Epub 2015 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing effectiveness of ABCDE Framework for teaching condylar fracture reduction in dental education: a mixed methods study.评估ABCDE框架在牙科教育中用于髁突骨折复位教学的有效性:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):1129. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07705-7.
2
One-Minute Preceptor, SNAPPS, and Traditional Teaching in the Acquisition of Clinical Reasoning Skills by Medical Students.医学生在获取临床推理技能过程中的一分钟带教法、SNAPPS法及传统教学法
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Nov 28;35(2):823-835. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02241-3. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Developing clinical reasoning along the cognitive continuum: a mixed methods evaluation of a novel Clinical Diagnosis Assessment.
沿着认知连续体培养临床推理能力:一项新型临床诊断评估的混合方法评价
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 8;25(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06613-6.
4
Effectiveness of SNAPPS Implementation in the Family Medicine Residency Program in Erbil: A Randomized Controlled Trial.《SNAPPS在埃尔比勒家庭医学住院医师培训项目中的实施效果:一项随机对照试验》
Cureus. 2024 Jul 19;16(7):e64897. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64897. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Fostering clinical reasoning ability in preclinical students through an illness script worksheet approach in flipped learning: a quasi-experimental study.翻转学习中通过疾病脚本工作表方法培养临床推理能力:一项准实验研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):658. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05614-9.
6
Clinical reasoning skills of German and Dutch manual therapists: a cross-sectional study.德国和荷兰手动治疗师的临床推理技能:一项横断面研究。
J Man Manip Ther. 2024 Oct;32(5):531-539. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2024.2330775. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
7
Validating the Korean shorter Diagnostic Thinking Inventory in medical education: a pilot study.验证韩国版较短诊断思维量表在医学教育中的有效性:一项试点研究。
Korean J Med Educ. 2024 Mar;36(1):17-26. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2024.281. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
8
Promoting medical student's clinical reasoning during COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间促进医学生的临床推理能力。
Korean J Med Educ. 2023 Jun;35(2):187-198. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2023.259. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
9
Assessment of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Thinking among Dental Students.牙科学生临床推理与诊断思维的评估
Int J Dent. 2022 Sep 26;2022:1085326. doi: 10.1155/2022/1085326. eCollection 2022.
10
Assessing clinical reasoning ability in fourth-year medical students via an integrative group history-taking with an individual reasoning activity.通过整合式小组问诊与个体推理活动评估四年级医学生的临床推理能力。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 26;22(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03649-4.