Department of Pharmacy, Gifu University Hospital, Yanagido, Gifu, Japan.
Clin J Pain. 2012 Jun;28(5):373-81. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318237d626.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic treatment with laxatives and antiemetics on the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions such as constipation, nausea and vomiting in cancer patients who received oral opioid analgesics for the first time.
A multi-institutional retrospective study was carried out, in which 619 eligible hospitalized patients receiving oral opioid analgesics for cancer pain were enrolled from 35 medical institutions. The primary endpoint was the incidence of opioid-induced side effects in patients receiving prophylactic medication. Odds ratios of the incidence of adverse reactions in the absence or presence of premedication obtained from several institutions were subjected to a meta-analysis.
Among 619 patients, the incidence of constipation was significantly lower in patients receiving laxatives, including magnesium oxide, as premedication than in those without them (34% vs. 55%, odds ratio=0.432, 95% confidence interval=0.300-0.622, P<0.001). However, the incidence of nausea or vomiting was similar regardless of prophylactic medication with dopamine D2 blockers. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that prophylactic laxatives significantly reduced the incidence of constipation (overall odds ratio=0.469, 95% confidence interval=0.231-0.955, P=0.037), whereas dopamine D2 blockers were not effective in preventing opioid-induced nausea or vomiting.
We showed evidence for the effectiveness of premedication with laxatives for prevention of opioid-induced constipation. However, premedication with dopamine D2 blockers was not sufficient to prevent nausea or vomiting.
本研究旨在评估预防性使用缓泻剂和止吐药对首次接受口服阿片类镇痛药的癌症患者胃肠道不良反应(如便秘、恶心和呕吐)发生率的影响。
进行了一项多机构回顾性研究,从 35 家医疗机构中纳入了 619 名符合条件的接受口服阿片类镇痛药治疗癌症疼痛的住院患者。主要终点是接受预防性治疗的患者中出现阿片类药物相关不良反应的发生率。来自多个机构的无预防性治疗和有预防性治疗的不良反应发生率的比值比进行了荟萃分析。
在 619 名患者中,接受包括氧化镁在内的缓泻剂预防性治疗的患者便秘发生率明显低于未接受预防性治疗的患者(34% vs. 55%,比值比=0.432,95%置信区间=0.300-0.622,P<0.001)。然而,预防性使用多巴胺 D2 阻滞剂与否,恶心或呕吐的发生率相似。荟萃分析结果表明,预防性使用缓泻剂可显著降低便秘的发生率(总体比值比=0.469,95%置信区间=0.231-0.955,P=0.037),而多巴胺 D2 阻滞剂对预防阿片类药物引起的恶心或呕吐无效。
我们提供了预防性使用缓泻剂预防阿片类药物引起的便秘的有效性证据。然而,预防性使用多巴胺 D2 阻滞剂不足以预防恶心或呕吐。