Sharma Punit, Singh Harmandeep, Kumar Rakesh, Bal Chandrasekhar, Thulkar Sanjay, Seenu Vulatheru, Malhotra Arun
Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Nucl Med Commun. 2012 Feb;33(2):139-47. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32834e3b14.
To evaluate the incremental value of single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography (SPECT-CT) over planar scintigraphy and SPECT alone for equivocal bone scintigraphy lesions in patients with breast cancer and to assess its impact on patient management.
A total of 102 patients with 115 equivocal lesions on planar scintigraphy underwent SPECT and SPECT-CT of selected volume. Images were evaluated in separate sessions to minimize recall bias. A scoring scale of 1-5 was used, where 1 is definitely metastatic, 2 is probably metastatic, 3 is indeterminate, 4 is probably benign, and 5 is definitely benign. With receiver operating characteristic analysis, area under the curves was constructed for each modality. Clinical/imaging follow-up and/or histopathology were taken as the reference standard.
There were 52 indeterminate lesions on planar scintigraphy, 15 on SPECT, and three on SPECT-CT. Area under the curve for SPECT-CT was significantly larger compared with planar scintigraphy (P<0.001) and SPECT (P=0.033). This improvement was mostly for lytic lesions (P<0.0001). In patients (n=67) in whom the lesions under evaluation were the only lesions and hence whose management was decided, SPECT-CT was superior to SPECT (P=0.045) and planar scintigraphy (P <0.001).
SPECT-CT is better than planar scintigraphy and SPECT alone for characterizing equivocal bone scintigraphy lesions in patients with breast cancer and can have a significant impact on patient management.
评估单光子发射计算机断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(SPECT-CT)相对于平面闪烁扫描和单独的SPECT在乳腺癌患者骨闪烁扫描病变不明确时的增量价值,并评估其对患者管理的影响。
共有102例在平面闪烁扫描中有115处不明确病变的患者接受了选定部位的SPECT和SPECT-CT检查。图像在不同时间段进行评估,以尽量减少回忆偏倚。使用1-5分的评分量表,其中1分表示肯定为转移性,2分表示可能为转移性,3分表示不确定,4分表示可能为良性,5分表示肯定为良性。通过受试者操作特征分析,为每种检查方式构建曲线下面积。以临床/影像随访和/或组织病理学作为参考标准。
平面闪烁扫描中有52处不确定病变,SPECT中有15处,SPECT-CT中有3处。与平面闪烁扫描(P<0.001)和SPECT(P=0.033)相比,SPECT-CT的曲线下面积显著更大。这种改善主要体现在溶骨性病变上(P<0.0001)。在评估的病变是唯一病变且因此决定其治疗方案的患者(n=67)中,SPECT-CT优于SPECT(P=0.045)和平面闪烁扫描(P<0.001)。
对于乳腺癌患者骨闪烁扫描不明确的病变,SPECT-CT比单独的平面闪烁扫描和SPECT更能准确判断,并且对患者管理有显著影响。