Suppr超能文献

寰枢椎后路固定技术的生物力学比较:经寰枢关节螺钉和直接枕骨髁螺钉。

Biomechanical comparison of occiput-C1-C2 fixation techniques: C0-C1 transarticular screw and direct occiput condyle screw.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 20;37(12):E696-701. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182436669.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro human cadaveric biomechanical study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to evaluate and compare the construct stability of occiput-C1-C2 fixation provided by C0-C1 transarticular screws or occipital condyle screws.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The placement of an occipital plate is commonly recommended in occipitocervical fixation surgery. However, there are unique clinical situations in which the placement of the occipital plate may not be possible or may have already failed. For these situations, 2 novel techniques that use the occipital condyle have been recently introduced: (1) C0-C1 transarticular screws fixation and (2) direct occipital condyle screws and C1 lateral mass screws fixation. However, there is a lack of thorough biomechanics studies of these techniques.

METHODS

Nondestructive kinematic tests and destructive tests were conducted in 16 fresh frozen cadaveric spines. As a nondestructive kinematic test, a pure moment of up to 2.0 N·m was applied in smooth continuous flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation motions. In addition to an intact-state case, a total of 5 different constructs (standard occipital plate, C0-C1 transarticular screws with/without occipital plate, and occipital condyle screws with/without occipital plate) were tested after destabilization of C0-C1 and C1-C2. All constructs had C2 pedicle screws fixation, and occipital condyle screws were incorporated with C1 lateral screws.

RESULTS

All fixation techniques significantly reduced ranges of motion compared with the intact state. In comparison with the standard occipital plate construct, the 2 novel techniques showed higher stability in axial rotation and lower stability in lateral bending. In both nondestructive and destructive tests, there were no statistical differences between C0-C1 transarticular screw construct and occipital condyle screw construct.

CONCLUSION

The C0-C1 transarticular screw technique and direct occipital condyle screw with C1 lateral mass screw technique can be salvage fixation methods when occipital plate fixation is not feasible.

摘要

研究设计

体外人体尸体生物力学研究。

目的

评估和比较 C0-C1 经关节螺钉或枕骨髁螺钉固定枕骨-C1-C2 结构的稳定性。

背景资料概要

在枕骨颈固定手术中,通常建议使用枕骨板。然而,在一些特殊的临床情况下,可能无法或已经无法放置枕骨板。对于这些情况,最近引入了两种使用枕骨髁的新方法:(1)C0-C1 经关节螺钉固定,(2)直接枕骨髁螺钉和 C1 侧块螺钉固定。然而,这些技术的彻底生物力学研究却很少。

方法

对 16 具新鲜冷冻尸体脊柱进行非破坏性运动学测试和破坏性测试。作为非破坏性运动学测试,在平稳连续屈伸、侧屈和轴向旋转运动中施加高达 2.0 N·m 的纯力矩。除完整状态外,在 C0-C1 和 C1-C2 失稳后,总共测试了 5 种不同的结构(标准枕骨板、C0-C1 经关节螺钉加/不加枕骨板、枕骨髁螺钉加/不加枕骨板)。所有结构均有 C2 椎弓根螺钉固定,枕骨髁螺钉与 C1 侧块螺钉结合。

结果

所有固定技术与完整状态相比,均显著降低了运动范围。与标准枕骨板结构相比,2 种新方法在轴向旋转方面表现出更高的稳定性,在侧屈方面表现出更低的稳定性。在非破坏性和破坏性测试中,C0-C1 经关节螺钉组和枕骨髁螺钉组之间无统计学差异。

结论

当枕骨板固定不可行时,C0-C1 经关节螺钉技术和直接枕骨髁螺钉与 C1 侧块螺钉技术可作为挽救性固定方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验