Department of Kinesiology & Rehabilitation Science, Human Performance Lab, College of Education, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii.
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Nov;26(11):3067-74. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318243fa1f.
This study examined the validity of estimating anaerobic power in college-aged students using anthropometric data and a paper and pencil test. Peak power (PP) and mean power (MP) were determined for 157 subjects (92 men and 65 women) using a standard Wingate anaerobic test (WAnT) at a resistance of 0.075 and 0.10 kg·body mass for women and men, respectively. Subjects completed previously established paper and pencil tests for assessing aerobic capacity and rated their ability to perform tasks related to anaerobic power, such as their vertical jump height relative to peers. Descriptive statistics were generated, and multiple regression was performed using SAS v9.1 to assess the ability of paper and pencil tests to predict PP and MP from the WAnT. Mean (±SD) age, height, body mass, body mass index, PP, and MP for subjects were 22.1 ± 2.5 years, 175.6 ± 7.5 cm, 78.5 ± 11.4 kg, 25.4 ± 3.0 kg·m, 1015.2 ± 169.7 W, and 784.5 ± 122.1 W and 22.0 ± 3.0 years, 163.6 ± 7.4 cm, 61.1 ± 10.4 kg, 22.8 ± 3.4 kg·m, 593.0 ± 102.4 W, and 478.8 ± 72.8 W, respectively. Mean estimated jump height (EJHt) rating values were 5.8 ± 1.5 and 4.7 ± 1.5 (on a 1-9 Likert-type scale) for men and women, respectively. The following multiple regression models were developed:PP = -34.5 + 249.6 (gender; female = 0, male = 1) + 8.1 (BMkg) + 27.8 (EJHt) (R = 0.82, SEE = 106.6 W);MP = -37.7 + 163.7 (gender) + 6.7 (BMkg) + 22.8 (EJHt) (R = 0.87, SEE = 65.5 W).It was concluded that valid estimates for PP and MP could be obtained from anthropometric data and a single question paper and pencil test asking subjects to estimate relative jumping ability, without the need for performing the Wingate anaerobic cycle test.
本研究旨在通过人体测量学数据和纸笔测试来检验估算大学生无氧功率的有效性。使用标准的测功计无氧测试（WAnT），在女性为 0.075kg·体重和男性为 0.10kg·体重的阻力下，对 157 名受试者（92 名男性和 65 名女性）进行峰值功率（PP）和平均功率（MP）的测定。受试者完成了先前建立的评估有氧能力的纸笔测试，并对与无氧能力相关的任务（例如，与同龄人相比的垂直跳跃高度）的执行能力进行评分。使用 SAS v9.1 进行描述性统计和多元回归，以评估纸笔测试从 WAnT 预测 PP 和 MP 的能力。受试者的平均（±SD）年龄、身高、体重、体重指数、PP 和 MP 分别为 22.1 ± 2.5 岁、175.6 ± 7.5cm、78.5 ± 11.4kg、25.4 ± 3.0kg·m、1015.2 ± 169.7W 和 784.5 ± 122.1W，22.0 ± 3.0 岁、163.6 ± 7.4cm、61.1 ± 10.4kg、22.8 ± 3.4kg·m、593.0 ± 102.4W 和 478.8 ± 72.8W。男性和女性的平均估计跳跃高度（EJHt）评分值分别为 5.8 ± 1.5 和 4.7 ± 1.5（1-9 级李克特量表）。建立了以下多元回归模型：PP=-34.5+249.6（性别；女性=0，男性=1）+8.1（BMkg）+27.8（EJHt）（R=0.82，SEE=106.6W）；MP=-37.7+163.7（性别）+6.7（BMkg）+22.8（EJHt）（R=0.87，SEE=65.5W）。结论是，无需进行测功计无氧循环测试，仅通过人体测量学数据和询问受试者相对跳跃能力的单一纸笔测试，即可获得 PP 和 MP 的有效估计值。
