School of Physical Education, Sport, and Exercise Science, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Jan;26(1):184-91. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31821852d0.
The purpose of this study was to determine if National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I men's tennis programs are in compliance with suggested current preactivity and postactivity stretching protocols. Questionnaires were sent to NCAA Division I men's tennis programs in the USA. Seventy-six coaches (73 men and 3 women) participated in the study. The results of the Chi-Square analysis suggest that the number of years of head coaching experience had a significant relationship with the preactivity stretching routines employed by coaches (p = 0.029). A significant difference was found between preactivity stretching routines and the key sources of influence for the foundation of knowledge regarding preactivity stretching (p = 0.012). Some results indicate that many tennis coaches do not use current suggested practices for preactivity stretching. The results of this study indicate that certification may influence how well research guidelines are followed. Further research is needed to delineate how these factors affect coaching decisions.
本研究旨在确定美国全国大学体育协会(NCAA)一级男子网球项目是否遵守现行的赛前和赛后伸展活动建议。我们向美国 NCAA 一级男子网球项目发送了问卷。共有 76 名教练(73 名男性和 3 名女性)参与了这项研究。卡方分析的结果表明,主教练经验的年限与教练采用的赛前伸展常规之间存在显著关系(p = 0.029)。在赛前伸展常规和影响赛前伸展知识基础的主要来源之间也发现了显著差异(p = 0.012)。一些结果表明,许多网球教练不采用当前建议的赛前伸展活动。本研究的结果表明,认证可能会影响对研究指南的遵循程度。需要进一步的研究来阐明这些因素如何影响教练的决策。