Carpenter D A, Grubb R L, Powers W J
Division of Radiation Sciences, Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Neurology. 1990 Oct;40(10):1587-92. doi: 10.1212/wnl.40.10.1587.
To investigate the possible existence of chronic selective hemodynamic impairment in the arterial borderzone regions of the brain, we used positron emission tomography (PET) to measure regional mean vascular transit time (rt, equal to the ratio of regional cerebral blood volume to cerebral blood flow) and regional oxygen extraction fraction (rOEF) in 32 patients with either severe internal carotid artery stenosis or occlusion and 11 normal controls. Twenty-four of the patients had had TIAs or amaurosis fugax from 1 to 60 days before PET; all had normal brain CT. We used a stereotactic localization method to locate the anterior and posterior borderzone regions of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory. We then calculated ratios of each borderzone to the ipsilateral MCA territory for both rt and rOEF. There was no significant difference from control ratios in any patient subgroup including those with greater than or equal to 75% stenosis or occlusion, those with or without contralateral greater than or equal to 50% stenosis, or those with abnormal hemodynamics in the MCA territory. We therefore found no evidence for selective borderzone hemodynamic impairment in this group of patients with severe carotid artery disease.
为了研究大脑动脉边缘区是否存在慢性选择性血流动力学损害,我们使用正电子发射断层扫描(PET)测量了32例严重颈内动脉狭窄或闭塞患者以及11名正常对照者的局部平均血管通过时间(rt,等于局部脑血容量与脑血流量之比)和局部氧摄取分数(rOEF)。24例患者在PET检查前1至60天出现过短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或一过性黑矇;所有患者脑CT均正常。我们采用立体定向定位方法确定大脑中动脉(MCA)供血区的前、后边缘区。然后计算每个边缘区与同侧MCA供血区的rt和rOEF比值。在任何患者亚组中,包括狭窄或闭塞程度大于或等于75%的患者、对侧狭窄程度大于或等于50%的患者或MCA供血区血流动力学异常的患者,其与对照组的比值均无显著差异。因此,我们在这组严重颈动脉疾病患者中未发现选择性边缘区血流动力学损害的证据。