Suppr超能文献

弥散张量成像在轻度创伤性脑损伤诉讼中的应用。

Diffusion tensor imaging in mild traumatic brain injury litigation.

机构信息

Veterans Integrated Service Network 19, Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Denver VA Medical Center, 1055 Clermont Street, Denver, CO 80220, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(4):511-23.

Abstract

A growing body of literature addresses the application of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to traumatic brain injury (TBI). Most TBIs are of mild severity, and their diagnosis and prognosis are often challenging. These challenges may be exacerbated in medicolegal contexts, where plaintiffs seek to present objective evidence that supports a clinical diagnosis of mild (m)TBI. Because DTI permits quantification of white matter integrity and because TBI frequently involves white matter injury, DTI represents a conceptually appealing method of demonstrating white matter pathology attributable to mTBI. However, alterations in white matter integrity are not specific to TBI, and their presence does not necessarily confirm a diagnosis of mTBI. Guided by rules of evidence shaped by Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., we reviewed and analyzed the literature describing DTI findings in mTBI and related neuropsychiatric disorders. Based on this review, we suggest that expert testimony regarding DTI findings will seldom be appropriate in legal proceedings focused on mTBI.

摘要

越来越多的文献探讨了弥散张量成像(DTI)在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)中的应用。大多数 TBI 属于轻度,其诊断和预后常常具有挑战性。这些挑战在法医学背景下可能会加剧,因为原告试图提供客观证据支持轻度(m)TBI 的临床诊断。由于 DTI 允许量化白质完整性,并且 TBI 经常涉及白质损伤,因此 DTI 代表了一种展示归因于 mTBI 的白质病变的概念上吸引人的方法。然而,白质完整性的改变并非 TBI 所特有,其存在并不一定能确认 mTBI 的诊断。根据多伯特诉默雷尔道制药公司案塑造的证据规则,我们审查和分析了描述 mTBI 及相关神经精神障碍的 DTI 发现的文献。基于这一综述,我们建议,在专注于 mTBI 的法律诉讼中,关于 DTI 发现的专家证言很少会合适。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验