Moazzami Kasra, Majdzadeh Reza, Nedjat Saharnaz
School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Enghelab Street, Tehran, Tehran, Iran, 14395-195.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD008347. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008347.pub2.
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a major health problem and in about 1% to 2% of patients the disease progresses to critical limb ischaemia (CLI). In a substantial number of patients with CLI, no effective treatment option other than amputation is available and around a quarter of these patients will require a major amputation during the following year.
To determine the effectiveness and safety of autologous adult bone marrow derived mononuclear cells (BMMNCs) as a treatment for CLI.
The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group searched their Specialised Register (last searched November 2010) and CENTRAL (2010, Issue 4). We searched the reference lists of identified articles.
All randomised controlled trials of CLI in which participants were randomly allocated to intramuscular administration of autologous adult BMMNCs or control (either no intervention or conventional conservative therapy) were included. Studies on patients with intermittent claudication were not included.
Two authors independently selected trials, assessed trials for eligibility and methodological quality, and extracted data. Disagreements were resolved by consensus or by the third author.
Thirty-seven potential studies were identified after initial screening of titles and abstracts. Only two small studies, with a combined total of 57 patients, met our inclusion criteria and were finally included. In one study the effects of intramuscular injections of BMMNCs in the ischaemic lower limbs of patients with CLI were compared with control (standard conservative treatment). No deaths were reported and no significant difference was observed between the two groups for either pain (P = 0.37) or the ankle brachial pressure index (ABI) parameter. However, the treatment group showed a significantly smaller proportion of participants undergoing amputation compared with the control group (P = 0.026).In the other study, following subcutaneous injections of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for five days peripheral blood derived mononuclear cells were collected and then transplanted by intramuscular injections into ischaemic lower limbs. The effects were compared with daily intravenous prostaglandin E1 injections (control group). No deaths were reported. Pain reduction was greater in the treatment group than in the control group (P < 0.001) as was increase in ABI (mean increase 0.13 versus 0.02, P < 0.01). The treatment group experienced a statistically significant increase in pain-free walking distance compared with the control group (mean increase 306.4 m versus 78.6 m, P = 0.007). A smaller proportion of participants underwent amputation in the treatment group compared with the control group (0% versus 36%, P = 0.007).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The data from the published trials suggest that there is insufficient evidence to support this treatment. These results were based on only two trials which had a very small number of participants. Therefore evidence from larger randomised controlled trials is needed in order to provide adequate statistical power to assess the role of intramuscular mononuclear cell implantation in patients with CLI.
外周动脉疾病(PAD)是一个主要的健康问题,约1%至2%的患者病情会发展为严重肢体缺血(CLI)。在大量CLI患者中,除截肢外没有其他有效的治疗选择,且这些患者中约四分之一在接下来的一年中将需要进行大截肢。
确定自体成人骨髓来源的单核细胞(BMMNCs)治疗CLI的有效性和安全性。
Cochrane外周血管疾病小组检索了其专业注册库(最后检索时间为2010年11月)和Cochrane系统评价数据库(2010年第4期)。我们还检索了已识别文章的参考文献列表。
纳入所有CLI的随机对照试验,其中参与者被随机分配接受自体成人BMMNCs肌肉注射或对照(无干预或传统保守治疗)。不包括间歇性跛行患者的研究。
两位作者独立选择试验,评估试验的纳入资格和方法学质量,并提取数据。分歧通过协商一致或由第三位作者解决。
在初步筛选标题和摘要后,确定了37项潜在研究。只有两项小型研究,共计57例患者,符合我们的纳入标准并最终被纳入。在一项研究中,将CLI患者缺血下肢肌肉注射BMMNCs的效果与对照(标准保守治疗)进行了比较。未报告死亡病例,两组在疼痛(P = 0.37)或踝肱压力指数(ABI)参数方面均未观察到显著差异。然而,与对照组相比,治疗组接受截肢的参与者比例显著较小(P = 0.026)。在另一项研究中,皮下注射粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)5天后,收集外周血来源的单核细胞,然后通过肌肉注射移植到缺血下肢。将效果与每日静脉注射前列腺素E1(对照组)进行比较。未报告死亡病例。治疗组的疼痛减轻程度大于对照组(P < 0.001),ABI的增加也是如此(平均增加0.13对0.02,P < 0.01)。与对照组相比,治疗组无痛步行距离有统计学显著增加(平均增加306.4米对78.6米,P = 0.007)。与对照组相比,治疗组接受截肢的参与者比例较小(0%对36%,P = 0.007)。
已发表试验的数据表明,没有足够的证据支持这种治疗方法。这些结果仅基于两项参与者数量非常少的试验。因此,需要来自更大规模随机对照试验的证据,以便提供足够的统计效力来评估肌肉内单核细胞植入在CLI患者中的作用。