Suppr超能文献

伊达比星与多柔比星治疗晚期乳腺癌的对比性II期研究。

Comparative phase II study of idarubicin versus doxorubicin in advanced breast cancer.

作者信息

Martoni A, Piana E, Guaraldi M, Cilenti G, Farris A, Saccani F, Becchi G, Pannuti F

机构信息

Divisione di Oncologia, Ospedale Policlinico S. Orsola M. Malpighi, Bologna, Italia.

出版信息

Oncology. 1990;47(5):427-32. doi: 10.1159/000226863.

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to confirm the antitumor activity of orally administered idarubicin (IDA) in patients with advanced breast cancer. Doxorubicin (ADRIA) was chosen as control treatment and the patients were randomized to receive either IDA or ADRIA according to a 2:1 ratio. Sixty-three patients, 77% of whom were pretreated with chemotherapy excluding anthracyclines, entered the study. The doses were: IDA 45 mg/m2 orally on 3 consecutive days every 28 days: ADRIA 75 (60) mg/m2 intravenously every 21 days. A complete + partial response (CR + PR) was observed in 11/37 (30%) evaluable cases treated with IDA and in 6/19 (32%) cases treated with ADRIA. If all the patients were included, the CR + PR remission rates were 27.5 and 27%, respectively. There were no significant differences as regards time to remission, duration of remission and survival. None of 10 cases who crossed over the treatments responded to the second therapy. The most frequent side effects of IDA were myelosuppression and nausea/vomiting. The only significant statistical difference between the two anthracyclines was the lower incidence of alopecia after IDA. Although there were 3 cases of cardiotoxicity after ADRIA, 2 of which severe, no case of clinical cardiotoxicity was observed after IDA. The present study confirms that orally administered IDA is an active agent in advanced breast cancer.

摘要

本研究的目的是证实口服伊达比星(IDA)对晚期乳腺癌患者的抗肿瘤活性。选择多柔比星(ADRIA)作为对照治疗,患者按2:1的比例随机接受IDA或ADRIA治疗。63例患者进入研究,其中77%的患者在入组前接受过除蒽环类药物以外的化疗。给药剂量分别为:IDA每28天连续3天口服45mg/m²;ADRIA每21天静脉注射75(60)mg/m²。在接受IDA治疗的37例可评估病例中有11例(30%)观察到完全缓解+部分缓解(CR+PR),在接受ADRIA治疗的19例病例中有6例(32%)观察到CR+PR。若纳入所有患者,CR+PR缓解率分别为27.5%和27%。在缓解时间、缓解持续时间和生存率方面无显著差异。10例接受交叉治疗的患者中无一例对二线治疗有反应。IDA最常见的副作用是骨髓抑制和恶心/呕吐。两种蒽环类药物之间唯一显著的统计学差异是IDA治疗后脱发发生率较低。虽然ADRIA治疗后有3例发生心脏毒性,其中2例严重,但IDA治疗后未观察到临床心脏毒性病例。本研究证实口服IDA是晚期乳腺癌的一种有效药物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验