Potger Kieron C, McMillan Darryl, Ambrose Mark
Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, Australia.
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2011 Sep;43(3):115-22.
Microemboli are implicated in neurological injury; therefore, the extracorporeal circuit (ECC) should not generate microbubbles or transmit introduced air. The venous reservoir is the first component in the ECC designed to remove introduced air. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relative safety of two kinds of adult venous reservoirs--the closed soft-shell venous reservoir (SSVR [Medtronic CBMVR 1600]) and the open hard-shell venous reservoir (HSVR [Affinity NT CVR])--in terms of microbubble generation and introduced air transmission. A recirculating in-vitro circuit was used to compare the two reservoirs with the SSVR further assessed in a fully closed or partially open state. Microbubbles were counted using a Hatteland CMD-10 Doppler in the outflow of the reservoirs before (microbubble generation) and after infusing 20 mL/min of air into the venous line (microbubble transmission) while altering pump flow rates (3 L/min; 5 L/min) and reservoir prime (200 mL; 700 mL). Negligible bubble generation was noted in the SSVRs at both flow rates and either reservoir volume. However, microbubble generation was significant in the HSVR at the higher flow rate of 5 L/min and lower reservoir volume of 200 mL. When infusing air, a flow of 3 L/min was associated with insignificant to small increases in microbubble transmission for all reservoirs. Conversely, infusing air while flowing at 5 L/min was associated with significantly more microbubble transmission for all reservoirs at both low and high reservoir volumes.The SSVR is as safe as the HSVR in microbubble handling as the generation and transmission of microbubbles by the SSVR is not more than the HSVR over a range of prime volumes and flow rates. As both reservoirs transmitted microbubbles at higher pump flow rates regardless of reservoir volumes, it is important to eliminate venous air entrainment during cardiopulmonary bypass.
微栓子与神经损伤有关;因此,体外循环(ECC)不应产生微泡或传输引入的空气。静脉储血器是ECC中旨在去除引入空气的首个组件。本研究的目的是就微泡产生和引入空气传输方面,研究两种成人静脉储血器——封闭式软壳静脉储血器(SSVR [美敦力CBMVR 1600])和开放式硬壳静脉储血器(HSVR [Affinity NT CVR])——的相对安全性。使用循环体外回路比较这两种储血器,并在完全封闭或部分开放状态下进一步评估SSVR。在储血器流出端,在改变泵流速(3 L/min;5 L/min)和储血器预充量(200 mL;700 mL)的情况下,在向静脉管路注入20 mL/min空气之前(微泡产生)和之后(微泡传输),使用Hatteland CMD - 10多普勒仪对微泡进行计数。在两种流速和任一储血器容量下,SSVR中的微泡产生均可忽略不计。然而,在5 L/min的较高流速和200 mL的较低储血器容量下,HSVR中的微泡产生显著。注入空气时,对于所有储血器,3 L/min的流速与微泡传输中不显著至小幅增加相关。相反,在5 L/min的流速下注入空气时,对于所有储血器,无论储血器容量高低,微泡传输均显著更多。在微泡处理方面,SSVR与HSVR一样安全,因为在一系列预充量和流速范围内,SSVR产生和传输的微泡不超过HSVR。由于无论储血器容量如何,两种储血器在较高泵流速下都会传输微泡,因此在心肺转流期间消除静脉空气夹带很重要。