• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭作为西方哲学中政治统治的基础:亚里士多德《政治学》与黑格尔《法哲学原理》的比较分析

The family as the foundation of political rule in western philosophy: a comparative analysis of Aristotle's politics and Hegel's philosophy of right.

作者信息

Jarvis Douglas E

出版信息

J Fam Hist. 2011;36(4):440-63. doi: 10.1177/0363199011416333.

DOI:10.1177/0363199011416333
PMID:22164889
Abstract

For both Aristotle and Hegel, the family is the foundation in which the universalized rule of law is validated according to the political structure of the 'Polis' or 'State' itself. This composite whole or structure of society (Ancient Polis/Modern State) is the political end of humanity for both philosophers, which in turn finds its primordial beginning in the family. For Aristotle, it is in the kingly rule of the household that the property-based distinction of citizenship is set for the rule of his ideal Polis. For Hegel, it is in the love affirmed through caring affection within the nuclear family that the dialectical framework for the freedom of civil society, and the rational unity of a congregational 'spirit' in the State, finds its foundation. For both thinkers, the family sets the base for a political theory that defines citizenship in a manner that transcends the particularities of kin bonds.

摘要

对亚里士多德和黑格尔而言,家庭都是这样一个基础,在其中,普遍化的法治依据“城邦”或“国家”自身的政治结构得到确证。这个社会的复合整体或结构(古代城邦/现代国家)对两位哲学家来说都是人类的政治目的,而这一目的又在家庭中找到其原初的开端。对亚里士多德而言,正是在家庭的君主统治中,基于财产的公民身份区分被确立起来,以用于他理想城邦的统治。对黑格尔而言,正是在核心家庭中通过关爱之情所确认的爱里,市民社会自由的辩证框架以及国家中群体“精神”的理性统一找到了其基础。对两位思想家来说,家庭都为一种政治理论奠定了基础,这种政治理论以超越亲属关系特殊性的方式界定公民身份。

相似文献

1
The family as the foundation of political rule in western philosophy: a comparative analysis of Aristotle's politics and Hegel's philosophy of right.家庭作为西方哲学中政治统治的基础:亚里士多德《政治学》与黑格尔《法哲学原理》的比较分析
J Fam Hist. 2011;36(4):440-63. doi: 10.1177/0363199011416333.
2
Hegel's notion of natural purpose.黑格尔的自然目的概念。
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2012 Mar;43(1):133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
3
Hegel, the Nazis, and child euthanasia.黑格尔、纳粹与儿童安乐死。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998 Jun;152(6):606-7.
4
Creuzerstreit .克勒泽尔争端
J Hist Ideas. 2019;80(2):271-288. doi: 10.1353/jhi.2019.0015.
5
[Intrinsic function of the state and change due to a global society].[状态的内在功能以及因全球社会而产生的变化]
Versicherungsmedizin. 2003 Mar 1;55(1):36-40.
6
Aristotle's ethical theory & modern health care.
Bull Indian Inst Hist Med Hyderabad. 1996;26(1-2):75-80.
7
[How to set up a family and have healthy children? Plato and Aristotle's formulas for good life].
Arch Hist Filoz Med. 2003;66(2):151-60.
8
The inertia of sex: Henry Adams on family and the politics of unconditional love.
J Fam Hist. 2010;35(3):286-307. doi: 10.1177/0363199010370403.
9
The historical origins of the vegetative state: Received wisdom and the utility of the text.植物状态的历史起源:公认的观点与文本的效用
J Hist Neurosci. 2017 Apr-Jun;26(2):140-153. doi: 10.1080/0964704X.2016.1184074. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
10
Methodology in Aristotle's Theory of Spontaneous Generation.亚里士多德自然发生论中的方法论。
J Hist Biol. 2018 Jun;51(2):355-386. doi: 10.1007/s10739-017-9494-7.