Suppr超能文献

心脏杂音的初步评估:实验室检查是否必要?

Initial evaluation of heart murmurs: are laboratory tests necessary?

作者信息

Smythe J F, Teixeira O H, Vlad P, Demers P P, Feldman W

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1990 Oct;86(4):497-500.

PMID:2216611
Abstract

Heart murmurs, most of them innocent, are the most common reason for referrals to a pediatric cardiologist. In the evaluation of murmurs, the electrocardiogram and echocardiogram are often included. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of these examinations in the initial assessment of heart murmurs in children and adolescents. In a prospective series of 161 patients, the clinical diagnosis of heart murmurs by a pediatric cardiologist was compared with that obtained after electrocardiogram and echocardiogram (two-dimensional, M-mode, Doppler, and color-Doppler). On the basis of the clinical diagnosis the patients were classified as having "innocent murmur," "pathologic murmur," or "possible pathologic murmur." A total of 161 patients (51% males), aged 1 month to 17 years (median 3.2 years), were studied. After electrocardiogram, no diagnosis was changed. After echocardiogram, the clinical diagnosis of innocent murmur in 109 patients changed in 2 to pathologic (small ventricular septal defect 1, small atrial septal defect 1); pathologic murmur in 46 changed to innocent in 3 and possible pathologic in 2; and possible pathologic in 6 changed to innocent in 3 and to pathologic in 2. The clinical examination by an experienced pediatric cardiologist is an accurate means of assessing newly referred patients with murmurs. The clinical examination had a sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 95%, positive predictive value of 88%, and negative predictive value of 98%. The electrocardiogram, unlikely to disclose any unsuspected heart disease, may assist in reaching the lesion-specific diagnosis when there is underlying pathology. Echocardiography, although diagnostic when heart disease is suspected, is unnecessary in pediatric patients with clinically diagnosed innocent heart murmurs.

摘要

心脏杂音(其中大多数为无害杂音)是转诊至儿科心脏病专家处的最常见原因。在评估杂音时,通常会进行心电图和超声心动图检查。本研究的目的是确定这些检查在儿童和青少年心脏杂音初始评估中的效用。在一项对161例患者的前瞻性研究中,将儿科心脏病专家对心脏杂音的临床诊断与心电图和超声心动图(二维、M型、多普勒和彩色多普勒)检查后得出的诊断进行了比较。根据临床诊断,患者被分类为患有“无害杂音”、“病理性杂音”或“可能的病理性杂音”。共研究了161例患者(51%为男性),年龄在1个月至17岁之间(中位数为3.2岁)。心电图检查后,诊断未发生改变。超声心动图检查后,109例被临床诊断为无害杂音的患者中有2例诊断变为病理性(小型室间隔缺损1例,小型房间隔缺损1例);46例病理性杂音患者中有3例变为无害杂音,2例变为可能的病理性杂音;6例可能的病理性杂音患者中有3例变为无害杂音,2例变为病理性杂音。经验丰富的儿科心脏病专家进行的临床检查是评估新转诊的有杂音患者的准确方法。临床检查的敏感性为96%,特异性为95%,阳性预测值为88%,阴性预测值为98%。心电图不太可能揭示任何未被怀疑的心脏病,但当存在潜在病理情况时,可能有助于做出病变特异性诊断。超声心动图虽然在怀疑有心脏病时具有诊断价值,但对于临床诊断为无害心脏杂音的儿科患者来说并非必要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验