Eberl Jason T, Kinney Eleanor D, Williams Matthew J
Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
J Med Philos. 2011 Dec;36(6):537-57. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhr047. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
Discussions concerning whether there is a natural right to health care may occur in various forms, resulting in policy recommendations for how to implement any such right in a given society. But health care policies may be judged by international standards including the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). The rights enumerated in the UDHR are grounded in traditions of moral theory, a philosophical analysis of which is necessary in order to adjudicate the value of specific policies designed to enshrine rights such as a right to health care. We begin with an overview of the drafting of the UDHR and highlight the primary influence of natural law theory in validating the rights contained therein. We then provide an explication of natural law theory by reference to the writings of Thomas Aquinas, as well as elucidate the complementary "capabilities approach" of Martha Nussbaum. We conclude that a right to health care ought to be guaranteed by the state.
关于是否存在医疗保健自然权利的讨论可能以各种形式出现,从而产生关于如何在特定社会中实施任何此类权利的政策建议。但医疗保健政策可能会根据包括联合国《世界人权宣言》(UDHR)在内的国际标准进行评判。《世界人权宣言》中列举的权利基于道德理论传统,为了评判旨在保障诸如医疗保健权利等特定权利的具体政策的价值,有必要对其进行哲学分析。我们首先概述《世界人权宣言》的起草过程,并强调自然法理论在确认其中所载权利方面的主要影响。然后,我们参照托马斯·阿奎那的著作对自然法理论进行阐释,并阐明玛莎·努斯鲍姆的互补性“能力方法”。我们得出结论,国家应该保障医疗保健权利。