Department of Family and Community Medicine, Native American Research and Training Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA.
Eval Rev. 2011 Oct;35(5):523-49. doi: 10.1177/0193841X11428978. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
Two case studies are presented to compare and contrast the challenges encountered when attempting to conduct participatory evaluations (P-Es) with tribal programs that represented two extremes of collaboration between the programs and evaluators. In one case, the P-E was successful because the principals were invested in the program, whereas in the second case, the absence of a shared program vision hampered the ability to adequately evaluate the program. The authors contend that governmental funding agencies have responsibilities to ensure that their expectations are appropriate, the proposed program is feasible, and that technical assistance should be provided before the grant is written, not after it has been funded.
呈现两个案例研究,以比较和对比在尝试对两个极端的部落项目与评估人员之间的合作进行参与式评估(P-Es)时所遇到的挑战。在一种情况下,P-E 是成功的,因为主要负责人对该项目投入了资金,而在第二种情况下,由于缺乏共同的项目愿景,从而妨碍了对项目进行充分评估的能力。作者认为,政府资助机构有责任确保他们的期望是恰当的,拟议的项目是可行的,并且应该在拨款之前而不是在拨款之后提供技术援助。