Philosophy, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK.
J Med Ethics. 2012 Feb;38(2):75-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100349. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
In this reply to Wilkinson and De Wispelaere, I argue that an opt-out donation system can be regarded as tacit consent. I first separate the opt-in/opt-out issue from that of the role that the family ought to play. I then argue that what De Wispelaere calls minimal approval-tracking is not obviously necessary and that, even if it were, opt-out schemes can satisfy this requirement.
在对 Wilkinson 和 De Wispelaere 的回复中，我认为，选择退出的捐献制度可以被视为默示同意。我首先将选择加入/选择退出的问题与家庭应该扮演的角色问题区分开来。然后我论证了 De Wispelaere 所谓的最低限度的同意追踪并非明显必要，即使需要，选择退出的方案也可以满足这一要求。
