Department of Emergency Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart Largo F. Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Dec;52(12):1872-8. doi: 10.1177/0091270011426876. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
Vernakalant is an emergent antiarrhythmic drug that, in preclinical studies, has demonstrated high efficacy in restoring sinus rhythm and safety in patients with rapid recent-onset atrial fibrillation. The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vernakalant for cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. PubMed, EMBASE, Clinical Trials Registry, and European Medicines Agency public reports were searched for randomized clinical trials, until May 2011, of vernakalant compared with controls (placebo/other antiarrhythmic drug) in enrolled patients with high ventricular rate atrial fibrillation. Five randomized trials that met inclusion criteria enrolled a total of 1099 patients. Among these, 810 had recent-onset atrial fibrillation. When compared with controls (placebo/other oral antiarrhythmic drugs), vernakalant was associated with a significant increase in cardioversion within 90 minutes from drug infusion (relative risk, 8.4; 95% confidence interval, 4.4-16.3; P < .00001). Compared with controls, vernakalant was not associated with a significant difference in serious adverse events (relative risk, 0.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.6-1.4; P = .64). The authors conclude that compared with controls, vernakalant is effective and safe for rapidly converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Questions remain surrounding safety because 1 unpublished trial was discontinued for this reason. Further cost-effective analysis and comparison with other antiarrhythmic agents, such as class I antiarrhythmic agents, should be investigated, especially in the emergency department.
维纳卡兰是一种新出现的抗心律失常药物,在临床前研究中已证明其在恢复窦性心律和治疗快速发生的近期发作的心房颤动患者中的安全性。本研究旨在评估维纳卡兰转复近期发作的心房颤动的疗效和安全性。检索PubMed、EMBASE、临床试验注册数据库和欧洲药品管理局公开报告,直到 2011 年 5 月,比较维纳卡兰与对照组(安慰剂/其他抗心律失常药物)治疗新发心房颤动患者的随机临床试验。符合纳入标准的 5 项随机试验共纳入 1099 例患者。其中,810 例患者患有近期发作的心房颤动。与对照组(安慰剂/其他口服抗心律失常药物)相比,维纳卡兰在静脉输注药物后 90 分钟内的转复率显著增加(相对风险 8.4;95%置信区间 4.4-16.3;P<0.00001)。与对照组相比,维纳卡兰在严重不良事件方面无显著差异(相对风险 0.9;95%置信区间 0.6-1.4;P=0.64)。作者得出结论,与对照组相比,维纳卡兰能有效且安全地转复近期发作的心房颤动。但由于 1 项未发表的试验因此原因而被终止,安全性问题仍存在争议。还应进行进一步的成本效益分析,并与其他抗心律失常药物(如 I 类抗心律失常药物)进行比较,特别是在急诊科。