Suppr超能文献

医院入院率与再入院率之间的关系。

The relationship between hospital admission rates and rehospitalizations.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 15;365(24):2287-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1101942.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Efforts to reduce hospital readmissions have focused primarily on improving transitional care. Yet variation in readmission rates may more closely reflect variation in the underlying hospitalization rates than differences in the quality of care during and after discharge.

METHODS

We used national Medicare data to calculate, for each local hospital referral region (HRR), the 30-day, 60-day, and 90-day readmission rates among patients discharged with congestive heart failure or pneumonia. We also calculated population-based all-cause admission rates among Medicare enrollees in each HRR. We examined the variation in HRR readmission rates that was explained by overall hospitalization rates versus differences in patients' coexisting conditions, quality of discharge planning, physician supply, and bed supply.

RESULTS

HRR readmission rates ranged from 11 to 32% for congestive heart failure and from 8 to 27% for pneumonia. In univariate analyses, all-cause admission rates accounted for the highest proportion of regional variation in readmission rates for congestive heart failure (28%, 34%, and 37% at 30, 60, and 90 days, respectively); the next highest proportions were explained by case mix (11%, 15%, and 18%) and the number of cardiologists per capita (12%, 14%, and 15%). Results for pneumonia were similar, except that the number of pulmonologists per capita accounted for a lower proportion of the variation (6%, 8%, and 7%, respectively). In multivariate analyses, admission rates accounted for 16 to 24% of the variation for congestive heart failure and 11 to 20% for pneumonia; no other factor accounted for more than 6%.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a substantial association between regional rates of rehospitalization and overall admission rates. Programs directed at shared savings from lower utilization of hospital services might be more successful in reducing readmissions than programs initiated to date. (Funded by the Commonwealth Fund.).

摘要

背景

降低医院再入院率的努力主要集中在改善过渡护理上。然而,再入院率的差异可能更能反映基础住院率的差异,而不是出院期间和之后护理质量的差异。

方法

我们使用国家医疗保险数据,计算每个当地医院转诊区(HRR)充血性心力衰竭或肺炎出院患者的 30 天、60 天和 90 天再入院率。我们还计算了每个 HRR 中医疗保险参保者的基于人群的全因入院率。我们考察了 HRR 再入院率的变化,这些变化是由整体住院率与患者并存疾病、出院计划质量、医生供应和床位供应的差异来解释的。

结果

充血性心力衰竭的 HRR 再入院率为 11%至 32%,肺炎为 8%至 27%。在单变量分析中,全因入院率占充血性心力衰竭再入院率的区域差异的最高比例(分别为 30、60 和 90 天的 28%、34%和 37%);其次是病例组合(11%、15%和 18%)和每千人心脏病专家人数(12%、14%和 15%)。肺炎的结果类似,只是每千人肺病专家人数占变化的比例较低(分别为 6%、8%和 7%)。在多变量分析中,充血性心力衰竭的入院率占 16%至 24%,肺炎占 11%至 20%;没有其他因素占比超过 6%。

结论

我们发现区域再入院率与整体入院率之间存在很大关联。与迄今为止启动的项目相比,旨在通过降低医院服务利用率实现共享储蓄的项目可能更有助于降低再入院率。(由英联邦基金会资助)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验