Oslo University Hospital, Geriatric Medicine, Oslo, Norway.
Clin Rehabil. 2012 Jun;26(6):502-12. doi: 10.1177/0269215511429473. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
To evaluate the effectiveness of lifestyle group intervention on well-being, occupation and social participation.
A randomized controlled trial.
Senior centres in the community.
Of 204 stroke survivors screened, 99 (49%) were randomized three months after stroke whereby 86 (87%) participants (mean (SD) age 77.0 (7.1) years) completed all assessments (39 in the intervention group and 47 in the control group).
A lifestyle course in combination with physical activity (intervention group) compared with physical activity alone (control group). Both programmes were held once a week for nine months.
The Short Form Questionnaire (SF-36), addressing well-being and social participation. Assessments were performed at baseline and at nine months follow-up.
We found no statistically significant differences between the groups at the nine months follow-up in the SF-36. Adjusted mean differences in change scores in the eight subscales of SF-36 were; 'mental health' (+1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.0, +7.6), 'vitality' (-3.0, 95% CI -9.6, +3.6), 'bodily pain' (+3.3, 95% CI -7.8, +14.4), 'general health' (-1.6, 95% CI -8.4, +5.1), 'social functioning' (-2.5, 95% CI -12.8, +7.8), 'physical functioning' (+1.0, 95% CI -6.7, +8.6), 'role physical' (-7.1, 95% CI -22.7, +8.4), 'role emotional' (+11.8, 95% CI -4.4, +28.0).
Improvements were seen in both groups, but no statistically significant differences were found in the intervention group compared to controls. An intervention comprising regular group-based activity with peers may be sufficient in the long-term rehabilitation after stroke.
评估生活方式团体干预对幸福感、职业和社会参与的效果。
随机对照试验。
社区中的老年人中心。
在筛选的 204 名中风幸存者中,99 名(49%)在中风后三个月进行随机分组,其中 86 名(87%)参与者(平均(SD)年龄 77.0(7.1)岁)完成了所有评估(干预组 39 名,对照组 47 名)。
生活方式课程结合体育活动(干预组)与单独进行体育活动(对照组)相比。这两个方案均每 9 个月进行一次,每周一次。
简短问卷(SF-36),评估幸福感和社会参与。在基线和 9 个月随访时进行评估。
在 9 个月的随访中,我们没有发现两组在 SF-36 上有统计学上的显著差异。在 SF-36 的 8 个分量表中,调整后的变化得分的平均差异为:“心理健康”(+1.8,95%置信区间(CI)-4.0,+7.6),“活力”(-3.0,95%CI-9.6,+3.6),“躯体疼痛”(+3.3,95%CI-7.8,+14.4),“一般健康”(-1.6,95%CI-8.4,+5.1),“社会功能”(-2.5,95%CI-12.8,+7.8),“身体功能”(+1.0,95%CI-6.7,+8.6),“角色身体”(-7.1,95%CI-22.7,+8.4),“角色情绪”(+11.8,95%CI-4.4,+28.0)。
两组均有改善,但干预组与对照组相比无统计学差异。定期与同龄人进行团体活动的干预措施可能在中风后的长期康复中已经足够。