Cross-sectional and in-plane coronary vessel wall imaging using a local inversion prepulse and spiral read-out: a comparison between 1.5 and 3 Tesla.

PURPOSE

To compare cross-sectional and in-plane coronary vessel wall imaging using a spiral readout at 1.5 and 3 Tesla (T).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Free-breathing coronary vessel wall imaging using a local inversion technique and spiral readout was implemented. Images were acquired in ten healthy adult subjects on a 3T clinical scanner using a 32-element cardiac coil and repeated on a 1.5T clinical scanner using a 5-element coil.

RESULTS

Cross-sectional and in-plane spiral vessel wall imaging was performed at both 1.5 and 3T. In cross-sectional images, artifact scores were superior at 1.5T (P < 0.05) but no significant difference was found in image quality scores compared with 3T. Image quality (P < 0.01) and artifact scores (P < 0.01) were found to be superior for in-plane images at 1.5T. Vessel wall sharpness in the in-plane orientation was also found to be higher at 1.5T (P < 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Although excellent in-plane coronary vessel wall images can be acquired at 3T, the overall robustness may be affected by off-resonance blurring due to increased B0 inhomogeneity compared with 1.5T.