Northern Regional Bleeding Disorders Center at Munson Medical Center, Traverse City, MI, USA.
Haemophilia. 2012 May;18(3):e115-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02709.x. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
The National Pain Study was a prospective, computer-based, descriptive survey of the pain experience of persons with a bleeding disorder conducted in the United States over a 28 month period from 2007 to 2009. The aim of this study was to (i) determine the language used by patients to describe and differentiate acute and persistent pain, (ii) describe pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies utilized to control pain, (iii) assess the perceived effectiveness of current pain management on quality of life and, (iv) to determine who provides pain management to this population. One thousand, one hundred and four surveys were received. Only the responses of the 764 respondents who reported having hemophilia A or B were evaluated for this paper. Thirty nine percent of participants reported their pain was not well treated. The average acute pain score associated with a bleed reported was 5.97/10 while the average persistent pain score reported was 4.22/10. The most frequently reported word descriptors for acute pain were: throbbing, aching, sharp, tender and miserable. The most frequently reported word descriptors for persistent pain were aching, nagging, tiring, sharp, and tender. The most frequently reported pain strategies for acute and persistent pain included factor, rest, ice, elevation, and compression. Alcohol and illicit drugs were reportedly used to manage both acute pain as well as persistent pain. Primarily, short-acting opioids and acetaminophen were reported to treat both acute and persistent pain. Hematologists and primary care providers provide the majority of pain management for persons with hemophilia (PWH). Quality of life (QOL) scores were lowest in the domains of pain, energy/fatigue and physical problems indicating disruption of QOL. This substantiates under-recognition and under-treatment of pain in the hemophilia population when combined with the 39% of respondents who felt their pain was not well treated and literature in the general pain population of wide spread under-treatment of pain.
The NPS is an initial step in recognizing the prevalence and description of pain in PWH. HTC providers should educate themselves in pain management techniques to better serve this population. Further research is necessary to develop specific pain management guidelines for the bleeding disorders population that include multimodal holistic treatment plans.
这项全国疼痛研究是一项在美国进行的前瞻性、基于计算机的、描述性的出血性疾病患者疼痛体验的调查,从 2007 年至 2009 年历时 28 个月。本研究的目的是:(i)确定患者用来描述和区分急性和持续性疼痛的语言;(ii)描述用于控制疼痛的药理学和非药理学策略;(iii)评估当前疼痛管理对生活质量的影响,以及 (iv)确定谁为这一人群提供疼痛管理。共收到 1104 份调查。本论文仅对报告患有 A 型或 B 型血友病的 764 名受访者的回复进行了评估。39%的参与者报告他们的疼痛没有得到很好的治疗。报告的平均急性疼痛评分与出血相关为 5.97/10,而报告的平均持续性疼痛评分为 4.22/10。急性疼痛最常报告的描述性词汇是:悸动、疼痛、锐痛、压痛和痛苦。持续性疼痛最常报告的描述性词汇是:疼痛、持续、疲倦、锐痛和压痛。急性和持续性疼痛最常报告的疼痛策略包括因子、休息、冰敷、抬高和压缩。酒精和非法药物被报告用于治疗急性疼痛和持续性疼痛。短期作用阿片类药物和对乙酰氨基酚主要用于治疗急性和持续性疼痛。血液科医生和初级保健提供者为血友病患者(PWH)提供大部分疼痛管理。生活质量(QOL)评分在疼痛、能量/疲劳和身体问题等方面最低,表明 QOL 受到干扰。这证实了在血友病人群中,疼痛的识别和治疗不足,再加上 39%的受访者认为他们的疼痛没有得到很好的治疗,以及一般疼痛人群中广泛存在的疼痛治疗不足的文献。
NPS 是认识 PWH 疼痛的普遍性和描述的初步步骤。HTC 提供者应接受疼痛管理技术方面的教育,以更好地为这一人群服务。需要进一步研究,为出血性疾病人群制定具体的疼痛管理指南,包括多模式整体治疗计划。