Bader F M, Islam N, Mehta N A, Worthen N, Ishihara S, Stehlik J, Gilbert E M, Litwin S E
Division of Cardiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, USA.
Transplant Proc. 2011 Dec;43(10):3877-81. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.09.039.
Limited and conflicting data exist on the diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection with the use of echocardiography. The purpose of our study was to evaluate various systolic and diastolic indices, including newer tissue Doppler imaging techniques, in diagnosing cardiac allograft rejection.
We prospectively performed 426 echocardiography studies at the time of endomyocardial biopsy in 54 cardiac transplant patients. We measured left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic dimensions, mitral inflow pattern and annular velocities, and the myocardial performance index. Biopsies were assessed for cellular rejection and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).
Mild cellular rejection was diagnosed in 74 biopsy specimens and significant cellular rejection in 10 biopsy specimens. AMR was diagnosed in 30 biopsy specimens. In patients with mild or significant cellular rejection, no significant differences in echocardiographic parameters were observed. In patients with AMR, LV fractional shortening was significantly reduced compared with those with no AMR (mean±SD 31.8±8.9% vs 36.0±7.1%; P=.02).
Although 1 echocardiographic parameter was statistically different in the setting of rejection, lack of consistency and overlap between nonrejection and rejection groups does not permit definitive noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection using this imaging modality.
关于使用超声心动图诊断心脏移植排斥反应的数据有限且相互矛盾。我们研究的目的是评估各种收缩期和舒张期指标,包括更新的组织多普勒成像技术,用于诊断心脏移植排斥反应。
我们前瞻性地对54例心脏移植患者在进行心内膜心肌活检时进行了426次超声心动图检查。我们测量了左心室(LV)的收缩期和舒张期尺寸、二尖瓣血流模式和瓣环速度以及心肌性能指数。对活检标本进行细胞排斥反应和抗体介导的排斥反应(AMR)评估。
在74份活检标本中诊断出轻度细胞排斥反应,在10份活检标本中诊断出重度细胞排斥反应。在30份活检标本中诊断出AMR。在轻度或重度细胞排斥反应的患者中,未观察到超声心动图参数有显著差异。在发生AMR的患者中,与未发生AMR的患者相比,左心室缩短分数显著降低(平均值±标准差 31.8±8.9% 对 36.0±7.1%;P = 0.02)。
尽管在排斥反应情况下有1个超声心动图参数在统计学上存在差异,但非排斥组和排斥组之间缺乏一致性和重叠性,不允许使用这种成像方式对心脏移植排斥反应进行明确的非侵入性诊断。