López B, Sanchez V, Delgado J F, Casares S F, Mora L, García J, Lombera F, Forteza A, Cortina J M, Saenz de la Calzada C
12 Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Transplant Proc. 2012 Nov;44(9):2639-41. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.09.058.
Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) can be estimated from transmitral or color M-mode Doppler flow propagation velocities. However, it has been recommended to not use these indices in heart transplant recipients. Our aim was to compare the accuracy of color M-mode, Doppler, and Doppler tissue imaging (DTI)-derived indices to predict PCWP in heart transplant recipients.
We studied 50 consecutive heart transplant recipients scheduled for routine right-sided heart catheterization and endomyocardial biopsy. Their mean age was 49 ± 17 years and the mean time after heart transplantation was 29 ± 41 months. An echocardiogram was performed immediately after the invasive procedure. We analysed PCWP, transmitral flow velocity variables (peak velocity during early filling (E) and deceleration time [DT]), color M-mode Doppler flow propagation velocity (Vp), and mitral annulus peak early diastolic velocity (E') from DTI. Doppler estimated-PCWP (ePCWP) was calculated as follows: (5.27 × E/Vp) + 4.6.
Mean ejection fraction was 66 ± 11%. The mean invasive measured PCWP was 11.14 ± 5.4 mm Hg and the mean noninvasive ePCWP was 11.13 ± 1.8 mm Hg (r = 0.66; P < .0001). A good correlation was present between invasive PCWP and mitral PW-Doppler and DTI parameters: peak E 91 ± 22 cm/s (r = 0.34; P = .02) and DT 143 ± 26 s (r = -0.436; P = .002), E/E' ratio medial mitral annulus 10 ± 4 cm/s (r = 0.353; P = .026) and E/E' ratio lateral mitral annulus 6 ± 2 cm/s (r = 0.462; P = .002). E/Vp was the most accurate index for predicting PCWP (r = 0.615; P < .0001).
Compared with other indirect Doppler indices, E/Vp showed the best correlation to predict PCWP in heart transplant recipients. Despite previous recommendations, PCWP can be accurately estimated from color M-mode indices, giving useful information and avoiding the risks of invasive measurements.
肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)可通过经二尖瓣或彩色M型多普勒血流传播速度来估算。然而,有人建议不要在心脏移植受者中使用这些指标。我们的目的是比较彩色M型、多普勒和多普勒组织成像(DTI)衍生指标预测心脏移植受者PCWP的准确性。
我们研究了50例计划进行常规右侧心导管检查和心内膜心肌活检的连续心脏移植受者。他们的平均年龄为49±17岁,心脏移植后的平均时间为29±41个月。侵入性检查后立即进行超声心动图检查。我们分析了PCWP、经二尖瓣血流速度变量(早期充盈峰值速度[E]和减速时间[DT])、彩色M型多普勒血流传播速度(Vp)以及DTI测得的二尖瓣环舒张早期峰值速度(E')。多普勒估算的PCWP(ePCWP)计算如下:(5.27×E/Vp)+4.6。
平均射血分数为66±11%。侵入性测量的平均PCWP为11.14±5.4 mmHg,非侵入性ePCWP的平均值为11.13±1.8 mmHg(r = 0.66;P <.0001)。侵入性PCWP与二尖瓣PW多普勒和DTI参数之间存在良好的相关性:E峰值91±22 cm/s(r = 0.34;P =.02)和DT 143±26 s(r = -0.436;P =.002),二尖瓣环内侧E/E'比值10±4 cm/s(r = 0.353;P =.026)和二尖瓣环外侧E/E'比值6±2 cm/s(r = 0.462;P =.002)。E/Vp是预测PCWP最准确的指标(r = 0.615;P <.0001)。
与其他间接多普勒指标相比,E/Vp在预测心脏移植受者PCWP方面显示出最佳相关性。尽管有先前的建议,但PCWP可通过彩色M型指标准确估算,提供有用信息并避免侵入性测量的风险。