Orthopedic Department, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Mar;40(3):606-10. doi: 10.1177/0363546511429778. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
Musculotendinous retraction is a limiting factor for repair of long-standing rotator cuff tears. However, it is currently unknown to what extent the muscle and tendon contribute to the degree of total retraction. Further understanding of this may possibly influence the strategy of musculotendinous reconstruction.
To analyze the contribution of muscle and tendon to the process of myotendinous retraction.
Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
Magnetic resonance imaging of 130 shoulders with intact (n = 20) or completely torn supraspinatus tendons was analyzed. Fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus muscle was graded according to Goutallier stages. The degree of retraction of the tendon stump and of the musculotendinous junction was assessed.
There were 30 shoulders without evidence of supraspinatus fatty infiltration, 25 with stage 1, 23 with stage 2, 25 with stage 3, and 15 with stage 4 changes. The corresponding tear sizes (distance of tendon end from greater tuberosity) were 4, 21, 27, 37, and 41 mm; the distance of the myotendinous junction from the greater tuberosity was 22, 33, 39, 48, and 48 mm; and the length of the tendons (distance of tendon end to myotendinous junction) was 19, 13, 12, 11, and 8 mm, respectively. In Goutallier stage 3 and above, and in case of a positive tangent sign, the musculotendinous junction was, in 90% of the cases, retracted to or beyond the glenoid.
Musculotendinous retraction in chronic rotator cuff tears results mainly from shortening of the muscle fibers but in advanced stages results also from shortening of the tendon tissue itself. The present data demonstrate, for the first time, that the residual tendon stump in a tendon tear does not have the length of the original tendon and is further shortened over time. Therefore, direct anatomic tendon reinsertion will result in lengthening of the supraspinatus muscle greater than what it would have been before the tear.
肌肉肌腱回缩是修复陈旧性肩袖撕裂的限制因素。然而,目前尚不清楚肌肉和肌腱在多大程度上导致了总回缩程度。进一步了解这一点可能会影响肌肉肌腱重建的策略。
分析肌肉和肌腱在肌肌腱回缩过程中的作用。
横断面研究;证据水平,3 级。
对 130 例肩袖完整(n=20)或完全撕裂的磁共振成像进行分析。根据 Goutallier 分期评估冈上肌的脂肪浸润程度。评估肌腱残端和肌肌腱交界处的回缩程度。
30 例肩无冈上肌脂肪浸润证据,25 例为 1 期,23 例为 2 期,25 例为 3 期,15 例为 4 期改变。相应的撕裂尺寸(肌腱末端到肱骨头的距离)分别为 4、21、27、37 和 41mm;肌肌腱交界处到肱骨头的距离分别为 22、33、39、48 和 48mm;肌腱长度(肌腱末端到肌肌腱交界处的距离)分别为 19、13、12、11 和 8mm。在 Goutallier 3 期及以上,以及切线征阳性时,肌肌腱交界处 90%回缩至或超过关节盂。
慢性肩袖撕裂中肌肌腱回缩主要是由于肌纤维缩短,但在晚期也由于肌腱组织本身缩短。目前的数据首次表明,撕裂肌腱的残端没有原来肌腱的长度,并且随着时间的推移进一步缩短。因此,直接解剖肌腱再插入将导致冈上肌的延长大于撕裂前的长度。