Leong Darryl P, Grover Suchi, Molaee Payman, Chakrabarty Adhiraj, Shirazi Mitra, Cheng Yi H, Penhall Amy, Perry Rebecca, Greville Hugh, Joseph Majo X, Selvanayagam Joseph B
Flinders Centre for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Research (FCCMR), Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Echocardiography. 2012 Apr;29(4):455-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2011.01594.x. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
Right ventricular (RV) systolic function as measured by right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) has long been recognized as an important predictor of outcome in heart failure patients. The echocardiographic measurement of RV volumes and RVEF is challenging, however, owing to the unique geometry of the right ventricle. Several nonvolumetric echocardiographic indices of RV function have demonstrated prognostic value in heart failure. Comparison studies of these techniques with each other using RVEF as a benchmark are limited, however. Furthermore, the contribution of these various elements of RV function to patient functional status is uncertain. We therefore aimed to: (1) Determine which nonvolumetric echocardiographic index correlates best with RVEF as determined by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging (the accepted gold standard measure of RV systolic function) and (2) Ascertain which echocardiographic index best predicts functional capacity.
Eighty-three subjects (66 with systolic heart failure and 17 healthy controls) underwent CMR, 2D echocardiography, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing for comparison of echocardiographic indices of RV function with CMR RVEF, 6-minute walk distance and VO(2 PEAK).
Speckle tracking strain RV strain exhibited the closest association with CMR RV ejection fraction. Indices of RV function demonstrated weak correlation with 6-minute walk distance, but basal RV strain rate by tissue velocity imaging had good correlation with VO(2 PEAK).
Strain by speckle tracking echocardiography and strain rate by tissue velocity imaging may offer complementary information in the evaluation of RV contractility and its functional effects.
长期以来,右心室射血分数(RVEF)所测量的右心室(RV)收缩功能一直被认为是心力衰竭患者预后的重要预测指标。然而,由于右心室独特的几何形状,通过超声心动图测量RV容积和RVEF具有挑战性。几种RV功能的非容积性超声心动图指标已在心力衰竭中显示出预后价值。然而,以RVEF为基准对这些技术进行相互比较的研究有限。此外,RV功能的这些不同要素对患者功能状态的贡献尚不确定。因此,我们旨在:(1)确定哪种非容积性超声心动图指标与心脏磁共振(CMR)成像所确定的RVEF相关性最佳(CMR成像被公认为RV收缩功能的金标准测量方法),以及(2)确定哪种超声心动图指标最能预测功能能力。
83名受试者(66名收缩性心力衰竭患者和17名健康对照者)接受了CMR、二维超声心动图和心肺运动测试,以比较RV功能的超声心动图指标与CMR RVEF、6分钟步行距离和VO₂峰值。
斑点追踪应变RV应变与CMR RV射血分数表现出最密切的关联。RV功能指标与6分钟步行距离的相关性较弱,但组织速度成像的基础RV应变率与VO₂峰值具有良好的相关性。
斑点追踪超声心动图的应变和组织速度成像的应变率在评估RV收缩性及其功能影响方面可能提供互补信息。