Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg , Engelbergerstraße 41, D-79085, Freiburg, Germany.
Ergonomics. 2012;55(1):23-36. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2011.638402.
We report two experiments that investigate the impact of rear-view mirror distance and curvature on distance, spacing, and time-to-contact (TTC) judgements. The variation in mirror distance had a significant effect on TTC judgements, but only marginally influenced distance and spacing estimations. As mirror distance increased, TTC was overestimated, which is potentially dangerous. Control conditions with identical visual angles across different mirror distances revealed that effects were not solely caused by variation in visual angle. The impact of mirror curvature moderated the effect. While observers were unable to compensate for the mirror distance effect, they could do so for the distortions generated by non-planar mirrors, at least up to a certain degree of distortion. Implications for vehicle design and national guidelines are discussed.
Regulations regarding rear-view mirrors are vastly different between countries. For instance EU regulations encourage convex driver-side mirrors, whereas US regulations allow them merely on the passenger's side. The use of a dynamic TTC paradigm puts the human factors designer in a position to evaluate the existing regulations and to design safer mirrors.
我们报告了两项实验,旨在研究后视镜距离和曲率对距离、间距和碰撞时间(TTC)判断的影响。后视镜距离的变化对 TTC 判断有显著影响,但对距离和间距估计的影响很小。随着后视镜距离的增加,TTC 被高估,这可能是危险的。在不同后视镜距离下具有相同视角的控制条件表明,这些影响不是仅由视角变化引起的。曲率的影响缓和了该效果。虽然观察者无法补偿后视镜距离的影响,但他们可以至少在一定程度上补偿非平面镜子产生的失真。讨论了对车辆设计和国家准则的影响。
各国关于后视镜的规定大不相同。例如,欧盟的规定鼓励使用凸面驾驶员侧后视镜,而美国的规定仅允许在乘客侧使用。使用动态 TTC 范式使人为因素设计师能够评估现有的规定,并设计更安全的后视镜。