Institute of Naval Medicine, Gosport, UK.
Ergonomics. 2012;55(1):114-28. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2011.634030.
This study investigated the effects of reclined backrest angles on cognitive and psycho-motor tasks during exposure to vertical whole-body vibration. Twenty participants were each exposed to three test stimuli of vertical vibration: 2-8 Hz; 8-14 Hz and 14-20 Hz, plus a stationary control condition whilst seated on a vibration platform at five backrest angles: 0° (recumbent, supine) to 90° (upright). The vibration magnitude was 2.0 ms(-2) root-mean-square. The participants were seated at one of the backrest angles and exposed to each of the three vibration stimuli while performing a tracking and choice reaction time tasks; then they completed the NASA-TLX workload scales. Apart from 22.5° seat backrest angle for the tracking task, backrest angle did not adversely affect the performance during vibration. However, participants required increased effort to maintain performance during vibration relative to the stationary condition. These results suggest that undertaking tasks in an environment with vibration could increase workload and risk earlier onset of fatigue.
Current vibration standards provide guidance for assessing exposures for seated, standing and recumbent positions, but not for semi-recumbent postures. This paper reports new experimental data systematically investigating the effect of backrest angle on human performance. It demonstrates how workload is elevated with whole-body vibration, without getting affected by backrest angle.
本研究调查了在垂直全身振动暴露下,斜倚靠背角度对认知和心理运动任务的影响。20 名参与者每人在振动平台上以五种靠背角度(0°(仰卧,俯卧)至 90°(直立))分别接受三种垂直振动测试刺激:2-8 Hz;8-14 Hz 和 14-20 Hz,以及一个静止控制条件。振动幅度为 2.0 ms(-2)均方根。参与者坐在其中一个靠背角度上,并在执行跟踪和选择反应时间任务的同时暴露于三种振动刺激中的每一种;然后他们完成了 NASA-TLX 工作量量表。除了跟踪任务的 22.5°座椅靠背角度外,靠背角度不会对振动期间的性能产生不利影响。然而,与静止状态相比,参与者在振动期间需要更多的努力来保持性能。这些结果表明,在振动环境中执行任务可能会增加工作量并增加疲劳的早期发生风险。
目前的振动标准为评估坐姿、站姿和仰卧位提供了指导,但不适用于半仰卧姿势。本文报告了新的实验数据,系统地研究了靠背角度对人体性能的影响。它展示了全身振动如何在不受靠背角度影响的情况下增加工作量。