Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, MA, USA.
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Jul;48(10):1495-502. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.018. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
Vinflunine (VFL) has been approved in the European Union for second-line treatment of advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract (TCCU) in patients who progress after a platinum based regimen. However, very few patients achieve response by response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST). Therefore, another 'response' threshold may be more useful than RECIST 1.0 in this setting.
One hundred and seventy nine patients with advanced TCCU treated with second-line VFL therapy had chest Computed Tomography (CT) and abdominal/pelvic CT or MRI performed at baseline and at first follow-up (6 weeks ± 3 days) after therapy initiation. Tumour measurements and response by RECIST 1.0 were correlated with overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were then used to determine the optimal size threshold to define 'responders'. Impact of adverse prognostic factors including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) >0, Hb <10 g/dL, and liver metastases was analysed.
Tumour response included 13 partial responses (PR) by RECIST 1.0 and 52 patients with ≥ 10% decrease in the sum of longest diameters. Responders by RECIST 1.0 did not have a statistically significant improvement in OS, while patients with sum long axis diameter (SLD) reduction of ≥ 10% had a longer OS than those with SLD reduction of <10%: 11.3 versus 6.9 months (log rank p=0.0224). ROC analysis yielded ≥ 10% decrease in SLD as the optimal size change correlating with OS. These results persisted on multivariate analysis.
In the study population, a ≥ 10% reduction in SLD at first follow-up imaging is a better early predictor of outcome than RECIST.
VINFLUNINE(VFL)已在欧盟获得批准,用于治疗在基于铂类方案治疗后进展的晚期尿路上皮移行细胞癌(TCCU)患者的二线治疗。然而,很少有患者通过实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST)达到缓解。因此,在这种情况下,另一个“缓解”阈值可能比 RECIST 1.0 更有用。
179 例接受二线 VFL 治疗的晚期 TCCU 患者在基线时和治疗开始后 6 周±3 天进行了胸部 CT 和腹部/盆腔 CT 或 MRI。RECIST 1.0 对肿瘤测量和反应与总生存期(OS)相关。然后使用 Kaplan-Meier 和受试者工作特征(ROC)分析来确定最佳大小阈值来定义“缓解者”。分析了包括东部肿瘤协作组体能状态(ECOG PS)>0、Hb<10g/dL 和肝转移在内的不良预后因素的影响。
肿瘤反应包括 13 例 RECIST 1.0 部分缓解(PR)和 52 例最长直径总和减少≥10%的患者。RECIST 1.0 的缓解者在 OS 方面没有统计学上的显著改善,而最长直径总和(SLD)减少≥10%的患者的 OS 长于 SLD 减少<10%的患者:11.3 个月与 6.9 个月(对数秩 p=0.0224)。ROC 分析得出 SLD 减少≥10%是与 OS 相关的最佳大小变化,是预后的更好早期预测指标。这些结果在多变量分析中仍然存在。
在研究人群中,首次随访影像学上 SLD 减少≥10%是比 RECIST 更好的预后早期预测指标。