Furubayashi Nobuki, Negishi Takahito, Yamashita Takuya, Kusano Shuhei, Taguchi Kenichi, Shimokawa Mototsugu, Nakamura Motonobu
Department of Urology, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan.
Department of Pathology, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan.
Mol Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;7(6):1112-1118. doi: 10.3892/mco.2017.1452. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
There is no established standard second-line chemotherapy after the failure of the first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. With regards to second-line chemotherapy, methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (MVAC) was used from July 2009 onwards, and paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) was introduced in April 2014 at the National Kyushu Cancer Center. The present study aimed to assess the prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in second-line treatment that included best supportive care (BSC), and the tolerability and efficacy of TC chemotherapy. In total, 52 patients who were confirmed to have disease progression with first-line gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) between June 2009 and November 2016 were enrolled in the current study. In addition, 28 patients selected BSC as second-line treatment, while 24 patients received second-line chemotherapy (MVAC, n=8; TC, n=16). The median OS for BSC, MVAC and TC was 2.8, 5.4, and 12.7 months, respectively. The difference between BSC and MVAC was not statistically significant (P=0.596). However, the difference between BSC and TC was statistically significant after Bonferroni correction (P=0.002). Multivariate analyses revealed that anemia [hazard ratio (HR), 7.047; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.553-35.636; P=0.011], the presence of visceral metastasis (HR, 4.174; 95% CI, 1.506-13.429; P=0.005) and second-line treatment (TC HR, 0.296; 95% CI, 0.124-0.636; P=0.003) were independent prognostic factors. TC achieved an 18.7% overall response rate and a 56.2% disease control rate. Myelosuppression was the most common grade ≥3 toxicity, but no treatment-associated mortalities occurred during the study period. TC was associated with favorable benefits and safety, and may be considered a preferred regimen after the failure of GC.
对于晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌患者,一线基于顺铂的化疗失败后,尚无既定的标准二线化疗方案。关于二线化疗,2009年7月起使用甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、阿霉素和顺铂(MVAC),2014年4月在国立九州癌症中心引入紫杉醇和卡铂(TC)。本研究旨在评估包括最佳支持治疗(BSC)的二线治疗中总生存期(OS)的预后因素,以及TC化疗的耐受性和疗效。2009年6月至2016年11月期间,共有52例经确认一线吉西他滨和顺铂(GC)治疗后疾病进展的患者纳入本研究。此外,28例患者选择BSC作为二线治疗,24例患者接受二线化疗(MVAC,n = 8;TC,n = 16)。BSC、MVAC和TC的中位OS分别为2.8个月、5.4个月和12.7个月。BSC与MVAC之间的差异无统计学意义(P = 0.596)。然而,经Bonferroni校正后,BSC与TC之间的差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.002)。多变量分析显示,贫血[风险比(HR),7.047;95%置信区间(CI),1.553 - 35.636;P = 0.011]、内脏转移的存在(HR,4.174;95% CI,1.506 - 13.429;P = 0.005)和二线治疗(TC HR,0.296;95% CI,0.124 - 0.636;P = 0.003)是独立的预后因素。TC的总缓解率为18.7%,疾病控制率为56.2%。骨髓抑制是最常见的≥3级毒性反应,但研究期间未发生与治疗相关的死亡。TC具有良好的获益和安全性,可被视为GC失败后的首选方案。