Municipal Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Infectious Disease Control Division, P,O, Box 70032, 3000 LP Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Public Health. 2011 Dec 16;11:937. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-937.
Adolescents are a risk group for acquiring sexually transmitted infections (STIs). In the Netherlands, senior vocational school students are particular at risk. However, STI test rates among adolescents are low and interventions that promote testing are scarce. To enhance voluntary STI testing, an intervention was designed and evaluated in senior vocational schools. The intervention combined classroom health education with sexual health services at the school site. The purpose of this study was to assess the combined and single effects on STI testing of health education and school-based sexual health services.
In a cluster-randomized study the intervention was evaluated in 24 schools, using three experimental conditions: 1) health education, 2) sexual health services; 3) both components; and a control group. STI testing was assessed by self reported behavior and registrations at regional sexual health services. Follow-up measurements were performed at 1, 3, and 6-9 months. Of 1302 students present at baseline, 739 (57%) completed at least 1 follow-up measurement, of these students 472 (64%) were sexually experienced, and considered to be susceptible for the intervention. Multi-level analyses were conducted. To perform analyses according to the principle of intention-to-treat, missing observations at follow-up on the outcome measure were imputed with multiple imputation techniques. Results were compared with the complete cases analysis.
Sexually experienced students that received the combined intervention of health education and sexual health services reported more STI testing (29%) than students in the control group (4%) (OR = 4.3, p < 0.05). Test rates in the group that received education or sexual health services only were 5.7% and 19.9%, not reaching statistical significance in multilevel analyses. Female students were more often tested then male students: 21.5% versus 5.4%. The STI-prevalence in the study group was low with 1.4%.
Despite a low dose of intervention that was received by the students and a high attrition, we were able to show an intervention effect among sexually experienced students on STI testing. This study confirmed our hypothesis that offering health education to vocational students in combination with sexual health services at school sites is more effective in enhancing STI testing than offering services or education only.
青少年是感染性传播疾病(STIs)的高风险群体。在荷兰,高级职业学校的学生尤其处于风险之中。然而,青少年的 STI 检测率较低,促进检测的干预措施也很少。为了提高自愿性 STI 检测率,我们在高级职业学校设计并评估了一项干预措施。该干预措施将课堂健康教育与学校现场的性健康服务相结合。本研究的目的是评估健康教育和基于学校的性健康服务对 STI 检测的联合和单一效果。
在一项整群随机研究中,我们在 24 所学校中评估了该干预措施,使用了三种实验条件:1)健康教育;2)性健康服务;3)两种成分;和对照组。通过自我报告的行为和区域性健康服务的登记来评估 STI 检测。在 1、3 和 6-9 个月时进行随访测量。在基线时在场的 1302 名学生中,有 739 名(57%)完成了至少 1 次随访测量,其中 472 名(64%)有过性经验,被认为容易受到干预的影响。进行了多层次分析。为了根据意向治疗原则进行分析,对随访时缺失的观察结果,采用多重插补技术进行了插补。将结果与完整病例分析进行了比较。
接受健康教育和性健康服务相结合的干预措施的有过性经验的学生报告的 STI 检测次数(29%)高于对照组的学生(4%)(OR=4.3,p<0.05)。仅接受教育或性健康服务的组的检测率分别为 5.7%和 19.9%,在多层次分析中未达到统计学意义。女生比男生更常接受检测:21.5%比 5.4%。研究组的 STI 患病率较低,为 1.4%。
尽管学生接受的干预剂量较低,且流失率较高,但我们仍能够证明,向职业学生提供健康教育与在学校现场提供性健康服务相结合,在提高 STI 检测率方面比仅提供服务或教育更有效。