Wang Guang-lu, Jiang Li-bin, Zhang Xiao-jun, Wang Ning-li
Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing 100730, China.
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Sep;47(9):820-3.
To report the clinical features of occult macular dystrophy (OMD).
It was a retrospective case series study. 9 cases (14 eyes) with 3 males, 6 females, mean age 36 (7 to 53) years, were examined with vision acuity, fundus ophthalmoscope, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), electroretinogram (ERG), visual evoked potential (VEP), multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). In mf ERG, the amplitude density and implicit time of P1 ring1 and ring2 of the affected eyes were compared with the normal control eyes. The correlation between the implicit time & amplitude density of P1 ring1 & ring2 of the affected eyes and visual acuity were examined.
9 eyes VA were 0.05 to 0.2, 4 eyes were 0.3 to 0.6 and 1 eye it was ≥0.7. All of the 9 cases possessed their unique clinical features, including progressive visual decline, normal fundus, FFA, and F-ERG. Macular function impairment was showed only by mfERG. In mfERG, the results of comparison between the affected eyes and normal control eyes were as follows:On implicit time of P1 ring1, average figure of the affected eye group was (27.67±1.07) ms, the control group was (26.28±1.88) ms. The parameters were significant difference between 2 groups (t=-2.308, P<0.05). On ring1 amplitude density, average figure of the affected eye group was (42.71±15.48) nv/deg2, average figure of the control group was (66.79±14.87) nv/deg2, there was also a significant difference between two groups (t=5.259, P<0.05). On implicit time of ring2, average figure of the affected eye group was (27.80±1.20) ms, average figure of the control group was (26.91±0.82) ms, the results from the 2 groups showed significant difference (t=-2.275, P<0.05). On ring2 amplitude density, average figure of the affected eye group was (24.99±8.49) nv/deg2, average figure of the control group was (39.20±6.47) nv/deg2, there was significant difference between two groups (t=4.943, P<0.05). No correlation was found between the implicit time (r=-0.329, -0.369) & amplitude density (r=0.053, 0.057) of P1 ring1 & ring2 of the affected eyes and visual acuity (P>0.05).
The major signs of OMD are visual acuity decline with normal fundus, FFA and F-ERG, macular function impairment manifested only by mfERG. It's probably a type of cone dystrophy.
报告隐匿性黄斑营养不良(OMD)的临床特征。
这是一项回顾性病例系列研究。对9例(14只眼)患者进行了检查,其中男性3例,女性6例,平均年龄36岁(7至53岁),检查项目包括视力、眼底镜、眼底荧光血管造影(FFA)、视网膜电图(ERG)、视觉诱发电位(VEP)、多焦视网膜电图(mfERG)和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)。在mfERG检查中,将患眼P1环1和环2的振幅密度及隐含时间与正常对照眼进行比较。检测患眼P1环1和环2的隐含时间及振幅密度与视力之间的相关性。
9只眼视力为0.05至0.2,4只眼为0.3至0.6,1只眼≥0.7。9例患者均具有独特的临床特征,包括进行性视力下降、眼底、FFA及F-ERG正常。仅mfERG显示黄斑功能受损。在mfERG检查中,患眼与正常对照眼的比较结果如下:在P1环1的隐含时间方面,患眼组平均值为(27.67±1.07)ms,对照组为(26.28±1.88)ms。两组参数差异有统计学意义(t=-2.308,P<0.05)。在环1振幅密度方面,患眼组平均值为(42.71±15.48)nv/deg2,对照组平均值为(66.79±14.87)nv/deg2,两组间也有显著差异(t=5.259,P<0.05)。在环2的隐含时间方面,患眼组平均值为(27.80±1.20)ms,对照组平均值为(26.91±0.82)ms,两组结果差异有统计学意义(t=-2.275,P<0.05)。在环2振幅密度方面,患眼组平均值为(24.99±8.49)nv/deg2,对照组平均值为(39.20±6.47)nv/deg2,两组间有显著差异(t=4.943,P<0.05)。患眼P1环1和环2的隐含时间(r=-0.329,-0.369)及振幅密度(r=0.053,0.057)与视力之间均未发现相关性(P>0.05)。
OMD的主要体征是视力下降,眼底、FFA及F-ERG正常,仅mfERG显示黄斑功能受损。它可能是一种视锥细胞营养不良类型。