Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Health Policy. 2012 Feb;104(2):163-71. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.11.010. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
The German hospital market has been subject over the past two decades to a variety of healthcare reforms. Particularly the introduction of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) in 2004 aimed to increase efficiency of hospitals. The objective of the paper is to review recent studies comparing the efficiency of German public, private non-profit and private for-profit hospitals. The results of the studies are quite mixed. However, in line with the evidence found in studies from other countries, especially the US, the evidence from Germany suggests that private ownership (i.e., private non-profit and private for-profit) is not necessarily associated with higher efficiency compared to public ownership. This may be a surprising result to many policy makers as private for-profit hospitals are often perceived the most efficient ownership type by the public.
在过去的二十年里,德国医院市场经历了多种医疗改革。特别是 2004 年引入的疾病诊断相关分组(DRGs)旨在提高医院的效率。本文的目的是回顾最近比较德国公立、私立非营利和私立营利性医院效率的研究。研究结果相当混杂。然而,与来自其他国家(尤其是美国)的研究证据一致,德国的证据表明,与公有制相比,私有制(即私立非营利和私立营利性)不一定与更高的效率相关。这对许多政策制定者来说可能是一个令人惊讶的结果,因为私立营利性医院通常被公众认为是最有效率的所有制类型。