Cillo Joseph E
Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, West Penn Allegheny Health System, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Mar;70(3):537-46. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.036. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic stability and efficacy of 3 different propofol-ketamine admixtures compared with a propofol-saline solution admixture for continuous-infusion intravenous general anesthesia in outpatient adult dentoalveolar surgery.
This was a prospective, randomized, positive-controlled clinical trial between a propofol-saline solution admixture and 3 propofol-ketamine admixtures comprising 4 groups: group A (control), propofol and saline solution; group B, 10:1 propofol-ketamine ratio; group C, 5:1 propofol-ketamine ratio; and group D, 3:1 propofol-ketamine ratio. The bispectral index (BIS) was used to monitor all patients for time to induction (BIS <70) to recovery time (BIS >90). The outcome variables-noninvasive systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures; pulse; and BIS-were recorded at baseline and every 5 minutes during surgery. One-way analysis of variance and χ(2) analysis were conducted on the groups to determine statistical significance, set at P < .05. Post hoc pair-wise comparisons with Bonferroni adjustments were conducted on statistically significant groups.
A total of 64 adult patients (37 men and 27 women; mean age, 27.3 years) who had dentoalveolar surgery under intravenous general anesthesia in an outpatient oral and maxillofacial surgery clinic setting were enrolled in this study. There were statistically significant differences between mean values of groups only for mean systolic blood pressure and mean blood pressure in groups A and D (127 mm Hg vs 146 mm Hg and 96 mm Hg vs 109 mm Hg, respectively). There were statistically significant differences in percent change from baseline measurements only between groups A and D for systolic blood pressure (-6.9% vs +1.3%), diastolic blood pressure (-5.4% vs +0.7), and mean arterial pressure (-0.5% vs +2.6%). All mean percent changes from baseline were within 20% of baseline. There were statistically significant differences between groups for number of boluses but not time to surgery start, movement on injection, or length of surgery. Statistically significant differences in recovery times were found between all groups except between groups A and C and groups C and D. There were no incidences of postoperative nausea or vomiting in the immediate postoperative period.
Through maintenance of hemodynamic stability and faster recovery time, the group B admixture (10:1 propofol-ketamine ratio) provided the greatest benefit for continuous intravenous general anesthesia in adults undergoing dentoalveolar surgery in an outpatient clinic setting.
本研究旨在评估3种不同的丙泊酚 - 氯胺酮混合液与丙泊酚 - 生理盐水混合液相比,用于门诊成人牙槽外科手术持续输注静脉全身麻醉时的血流动力学稳定性和疗效。
这是一项前瞻性、随机、阳性对照临床试验,比较丙泊酚 - 生理盐水混合液与3种丙泊酚 - 氯胺酮混合液,共分为4组:A组(对照组),丙泊酚和生理盐水;B组,丙泊酚与氯胺酮比例为10:1;C组,丙泊酚与氯胺酮比例为5:1;D组,丙泊酚与氯胺酮比例为3:1。使用脑电双频指数(BIS)监测所有患者从诱导期(BIS <70)到恢复期(BIS >90)的时间。在基线及手术期间每5分钟记录一次观察变量——无创收缩压、舒张压、平均血压、脉搏和BIS。对各组进行单因素方差分析和χ²分析以确定统计学意义,设定P <.05。对具有统计学意义的组进行Bonferroni校正后的事后两两比较。
本研究共纳入64例在门诊口腔颌面外科诊所接受静脉全身麻醉下牙槽外科手术的成年患者(37例男性和27例女性;平均年龄27.3岁)。仅A组和D组之间的平均收缩压和平均血压的组均值存在统计学显著差异(分别为127 mmHg对146 mmHg和96 mmHg对109 mmHg)。仅A组和D组之间收缩压(-6.9%对+1.3%)、舒张压(-5.4%对+0.7)和平均动脉压(-0.5%对+2.6%)相对于基线测量值的变化百分比存在统计学显著差异。所有相对于基线的平均变化百分比均在基线的20%以内。各组之间在推注次数上存在统计学显著差异,但在手术开始时间、注射时的移动或手术时长方面无差异。除A组与C组以及C组与D组之间外,所有组的恢复时间均存在统计学显著差异。术后即刻均未发生恶心或呕吐。
通过维持血流动力学稳定性和更快的恢复时间,B组混合液(丙泊酚与氯胺酮比例为10:1)为门诊接受牙槽外科手术的成人持续静脉全身麻醉提供了最大益处