• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低估双相抑郁的严重程度:汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表项目的比较。

Underestimating the severity of bipolar depression: a comparison of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale items.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2012 Feb;136(3):425-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.11.007. Epub 2011 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2011.11.007
PMID:22178241
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) is a clinician-rated instrument to assess the severity of depressive symptoms that does not account for the differences between bipolar (BP) and unipolar (UP) disorders. This study attempts to evaluate differences in the total scores of the HDRS, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) ratings of patients with bipolar II (BP-II) and UP depression. Each factor and item of the HDRS was compared between the two groups in order to identify specific symptoms.

METHODS

588 patients with bipolar II disorder (n=101) and major depressive disorder (n=487) were enrolled in this study. All participants completed the BDI and individually interviewed using HDRS. Each participant was also evaluated with regard to global functioning.

RESULTS

The BP group scored lower on the total HDRS and all of the factors. The BP and UP groups did not differ in terms of BDI and GAF. With regard to the individual items of HDRS, the BP group scored lower on items associated with 'Depressed mood', 'Work and interest', 'Somatic, gastro', and 'Hypochondriasis'.

LIMITATIONS

There was a significant age differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that the severity of bipolar depression may be less well-recognized by the HDRS due to the different presentations of depressive symptoms. Thus, the clinician should be careful not to underestimate the sincerity of patients' reports when evaluating depression.

摘要

背景

汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS)是一种临床医生评定工具,用于评估抑郁症状的严重程度,但没有考虑到双相(BP)和单相(UP)障碍之间的差异。本研究试图评估双相 II 型(BP-II)和单相抑郁患者的 HDRS 总分、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)和总体功能评估(GAF)评分之间的差异。为了确定特定的症状,比较了两组之间 HDRS 的每个因素和项目。

方法

本研究纳入了 588 例双相 II 型障碍患者(n=101)和单相重性抑郁障碍患者(n=487)。所有参与者均完成了 BDI 并单独使用 HDRS 进行访谈。每位参与者还进行了总体功能评估。

结果

BP 组的 HDRS 总分和所有因子得分均较低。BP 和 UP 组在 BDI 和 GAF 方面没有差异。在 HDRS 的个别项目方面,BP 组在与“抑郁心境”、“工作和兴趣”、“躯体、胃肠道”和“疑病症”相关的项目上得分较低。

局限性

两组之间存在显著的年龄差异。

结论

本研究结果表明,由于抑郁症状的表现不同,HDRS 可能对双相抑郁的严重程度认识不足。因此,临床医生在评估抑郁时应小心,不要低估患者报告的真诚度。

相似文献

1
Underestimating the severity of bipolar depression: a comparison of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale items.低估双相抑郁的严重程度:汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表项目的比较。
J Affect Disord. 2012 Feb;136(3):425-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.11.007. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
2
Subsyndromal depressive symptoms in patients with bipolar and unipolar disorder during clinical remission.双相情感障碍和单相情感障碍患者临床缓解期的亚综合征抑郁症状。
J Affect Disord. 2008 Apr;107(1-3):169-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.08.007. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
3
Discrepancy between subjective and objective severity as a predictor of response to chronotherapeutics in bipolar depression.主观与客观严重程度之间的差异作为双相抑郁症中时间治疗反应的预测指标。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Nov 1;204:48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.06.044. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
4
CLOCK gene variants associated with the discrepancy between subjective and objective severity in bipolar depression.与双相抑郁主观严重程度和客观严重程度差异相关的生物钟基因变异
J Affect Disord. 2017 Mar 1;210:14-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.007. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
5
A randomized controlled trial of duloxetine versus placebo in the treatment of nonmajor chronic depression.度洛西汀与安慰剂治疗非重症慢性抑郁症的随机对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;73(7):984-91. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07230.
6
Rating depression over brief time intervals with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: standard vs. abbreviated scales.使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表在短时间间隔内评定抑郁:标准量表与简化量表对比
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Feb;61:40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.12.015. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
7
A sham-controlled randomized trial of adjunctive light therapy for non-seasonal depression.一项针对非季节性抑郁症辅助光疗法的假对照随机试验。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Oct;203:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.062. Epub 2016 May 26.
8
Concordance of self-rated and observer-rated dysphoric symptoms in mania.躁狂症中自评与他人评定的烦躁症状的一致性。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):294-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.015. Epub 2008 Aug 6.
9
A factor analytic study in bipolar depression, and response to lamotrigine.双相抑郁的因子分析研究及拉莫三嗪的反应。
CNS Spectr. 2013 Aug;18(4):214-24. doi: 10.1017/S1092852913000291. Epub 2013 May 23.
10
Symptom components of standard depression scales and past suicidal behavior.标准抑郁量表的症状组成部分与既往自杀行为。
J Affect Disord. 2005 Jul;87(1):73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.03.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinct Predictors of Clinical Response after Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation between Bipolar and Unipolar Disorders.双相和单相障碍患者经重复经颅磁刺激治疗后的临床反应的不同预测因子。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 27;20(7):5276. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20075276.
2
Prevalence and Clinical Correlates of Insomnia in Depressive Disorders: The CRESCEND Study.抑郁障碍中失眠的患病率及其临床相关性:CRESCEND 研究。
Psychiatry Investig. 2013 Dec;10(4):373-81. doi: 10.4306/pi.2013.10.4.373. Epub 2013 Dec 16.