Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Jun;26(5):497-506. doi: 10.1177/1545968311423669. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
To assess the reliability of the electrical perception threshold (EPT) in healthy participants and its responsiveness in patients for 6 months after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).
The reliability of EPT measures was assessed in 15 healthy volunteers (from C3 to S2). EPT measures were assessed in 37 patients at 1, 3, and 6 months after SCI. EPT was determined in dermatomes at, above, and below the neurological level of lesion. Reliability was quantified with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and responsiveness with the standardized response mean (SRM). Dermatomes were classified as having normal or pathological sensory perception, based on both light touch (LT) and EPT testing. The percentage of agreement between LT and EPT classifications was determined.
The ICCs varied considerably between dermatomes (0.00 ≤ ICC ≤ 0.86). Overall, EPTs changed little within the first 6 months after SCI, resulting in small SRM values. Agreement between classifications according to EPT or LT testing varied from 30% to 100%. The least agreement was observed in the first segment below the lesion.
Future studies must note that the reliability of EPT differs between dermatomes in healthy participants. Furthermore, at and below the level of the lesion, spontaneous recovery of sensory perception is poor within the first 6 months after SCI. Based on subgroup analyses, if a translational trial aims to improve sensory perception around the level of the lesion, sensory-incomplete tetraplegic patients could be included. These patients show poor spontaneous recovery, and the EPT may detect subtle changes in perception.
评估健康参与者的电感觉阈(EPT)的可靠性及其在创伤性脊髓损伤(SCI)后 6 个月时的反应性。
在 15 名健康志愿者(C3 至 S2)中评估 EPT 测量的可靠性。在 SCI 后 1、3 和 6 个月时,对 37 名患者评估了 EPT。EPT 在损伤神经水平以上、以下和损伤神经水平处的皮节中进行测定。可靠性通过组内相关系数(ICC)进行量化,反应性通过标准化反应均值(SRM)进行量化。根据轻触(LT)和 EPT 测试,将皮节分类为感觉感知正常或异常。确定 LT 和 EPT 分类之间的一致性百分比。
ICC 在皮节之间差异很大(0.00≤ICC≤0.86)。总体而言,SCI 后前 6 个月内 EPT 变化很小,导致 SRM 值较小。根据 EPT 或 LT 测试的分类之间的一致性从 30%到 100%不等。在损伤以下的第一个节段观察到的一致性最低。
未来的研究必须注意到,EPT 在健康参与者的皮节之间的可靠性存在差异。此外,在损伤水平及以下,SCI 后前 6 个月内感觉感知的自发恢复很差。基于亚组分析,如果一项转化性试验旨在改善损伤水平周围的感觉感知,那么可以包括感觉不完全性四肢瘫痪患者。这些患者的自发恢复较差,EPT 可能会检测到感知的细微变化。