Brain-Computer Interfaces Lab, School of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Essex, CO4 3SQ Colchester, UK.
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012 Jan;20(1):8-17. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2174463. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
The oddball protocol is often used in brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) to induce P300 ERPs, although, recently, some issues have been shown to detrimentally effect its performance. In this paper, we study a new periodic protocol and explore whether it can compete with the standard oddball protocol within the context of a BCI mouse. We found that the new protocol consistently and significantly outperforms the standard oddball protocol in relation to information transfer rates (33 bits/min for the former and 22 bits/min for the latter, measured at 90% accuracy) as well as P300 amplitudes. Furthermore, we performed a comparison of two periodic protocols with two less conventional oddball-like protocols that reveals the importance of the interactions between task and sequence in determining the success of a protocol.
奇特协议通常用于脑机接口 (BCI) 来诱发 P300 ERP,尽管最近一些问题已被证明会对其性能产生不利影响。在本文中,我们研究了一种新的周期性协议,并探讨了它在 BCI 鼠标环境中是否可以与标准奇特协议竞争。我们发现,新协议在信息传输率方面(前者为 33 位/分钟,后者为 22 位/分钟,在 90%的准确率下测量)以及 P300 幅度方面均明显优于标准奇特协议。此外,我们还对两种周期性协议与两种不太传统的奇特样协议进行了比较,这揭示了任务和序列之间的相互作用在确定协议的成功方面的重要性。