• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从观察性队列研究中评估筛查的益处。

Estimating benefits of screening from observational cohort studies.

作者信息

Flanders W D, Longini I M

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30329.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1990 Aug;9(8):969-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780090812.

DOI:10.1002/sim.4780090812
PMID:2218198
Abstract

Analysis and interpretation of observational studies of screening effectiveness is difficult because several biases threaten validity, including the structural healthy screenee bias, length bias, and effects of lead time. Although methods for the analysis of observational studies of screening effectiveness have been proposed, most have limitations such as incomplete control of length bias, or a heavy reliance on distributional assumptions. In this report we present a method for the analysis of observational cohort studies of screening effectiveness. Although developed independently and formulated specifically for estimating benefits of screening, our approach is implied by a more general approach developed previously by Robins. Our approach, in contrast to other available methods, avoids the healthy screenee bias, and length and lead time bias, and allows an empirical approach to analysis that need not depend highly on distributional assumptions. We illustrate application of the approach with analysis of published data from a study of breast cancer screening.

摘要

对筛查效果的观察性研究进行分析和解释很困难,因为有几种偏倚会威胁到有效性,包括结构性健康受检者偏倚、病程长短偏倚和领先时间效应。虽然已经提出了分析筛查效果观察性研究的方法,但大多数方法都有局限性,例如对病程长短偏倚的控制不完整,或者严重依赖分布假设。在本报告中,我们提出了一种分析筛查效果观察性队列研究的方法。虽然我们的方法是独立开发的,并且专门用于估计筛查的益处,但它是由罗宾斯之前开发的一种更通用的方法推导而来的。与其他现有方法相比,我们的方法避免了健康受检者偏倚、病程长短偏倚和领先时间偏倚,并允许采用一种经验性的分析方法,该方法不必高度依赖分布假设。我们通过分析一项乳腺癌筛查研究的已发表数据来说明该方法的应用。

相似文献

1
Estimating benefits of screening from observational cohort studies.从观察性队列研究中评估筛查的益处。
Stat Med. 1990 Aug;9(8):969-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780090812.
2
Case-control evaluation of breast cancer screening efficacy.乳腺癌筛查效果的病例对照评估。
Am J Epidemiol. 1991 May 15;133(10):974-84. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115817.
3
Population estimates of survival in women with screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancer taking account of lead time and length bias.考虑到提前期和长度偏倚,对筛查发现的和有症状的乳腺癌女性的生存情况进行人群估计。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Jul;116(1):179-85. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0100-8. Epub 2008 Jul 12.
4
Continuous tumour growth models, lead time estimation and length bias in breast cancer screening studies.连续肿瘤生长模型、乳腺癌筛查研究中的领先时间估计和长度偏倚。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Feb;29(2):374-395. doi: 10.1177/0962280219832901. Epub 2019 Mar 10.
5
[Dentification and correction of the lead-time bias and length bias in cancer screening studies].[癌症筛查研究中领先时间偏倚和长度偏倚的识别与校正]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Nov 6;53(11):1183-1187. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2019.11.022.
6
Correcting for lead time and length bias in estimating the effect of screen detection on cancer survival.在估计筛查检测对癌症生存的影响时校正领先时间和长度偏倚。
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Jul 1;168(1):98-104. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn120. Epub 2008 May 25.
7
Restriction as a method for reducing bias in the estimation of direct effects.作为减少直接效应估计中偏差的一种方法的限制。
Stat Med. 1998 Oct 15;17(19):2233-49. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2233::aid-sim922>3.0.co;2-0.
8
Reducing the effects of lead-time bias, length bias and over-detection in evaluating screening mammography: a censored bivariate data approach.在评估乳腺钼靶筛查中减少领先时间偏倚、长度偏倚和过度检测的影响:一种删失双变量数据方法
Stat Methods Med Res. 2008 Dec;17(6):643-63. doi: 10.1177/0962280207087309. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
9
[The yield of breast cancer screening: the importance of observational data and the problems of bias].[乳腺癌筛查的收益:观察性数据的重要性及偏倚问题]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004 Feb 21;148(8):352-5.
10
Assessment of lead-time bias in estimates of relative survival for breast cancer.乳腺癌相对生存率估计中领先时间偏倚的评估。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;46:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.12.004. Epub 2016 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Is it worthwhile to conduct a randomized controlled trial of glaucoma screening in the United Kingdom?在英国开展青光眼筛查的随机对照试验是否值得?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2014 Jan;19(1):42-51. doi: 10.1177/1355819613499748. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
2
Bayesian inference for the lead time in periodic cancer screening.周期性癌症筛查中提前期的贝叶斯推断。
Biometrics. 2007 Sep;63(3):873-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00732.x.
3
Using observational data to estimate an upper bound on the reduction in cancer mortality due to periodic screening.
利用观察性数据估计定期筛查导致的癌症死亡率降低的上限。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003 Mar 6;3:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-3-4.