• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于将1998年简略损伤量表映射到2008年量表并使用调整后严重程度的改良表格的验证。

Validation of a modified table to map the 1998 Abbreviated Injury Scale to the 2008 scale and the use of adjusted severities.

作者信息

Tohira Hideo, Jacobs Ian, Mountain David, Gibson Nick, Yeo Allen, Ueno Masato, Watanabe Hiroaki

机构信息

School of Primary, Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, University of Western Australia, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1829-34. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823cc5c5.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e31823cc5c5
PMID:22182893
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Abbreviated Injury Scale 2008 (AIS 2008) is the most recent injury coding system. A mapping table from a previous AIS 98 to AIS 2008 is available. However, AIS 98 codes that are unmappable to AIS 2008 codes exist in this table. Furthermore, some AIS 98 codes can be mapped to multiple candidate AIS 2008 codes with different severities. We aimed to modify the original table to adjust the severities and to validate these changes.

METHODS

We modified the original table by adding links from unmappable AIS 98 codes to AIS 2008 codes. We applied the original table and our modified table to AIS 98 codes for major trauma patients. We also assigned candidate codes with different severities the weighted averages of their severities as an adjusted severity. The proportion of cases whose injury severity scores (ISSs) were computable were compared. We also compared the agreement of the ISS and New ISS (NISS) between manually determined AIS 2008 codes (MAN) and mapped codes by using our table (MAP) with unadjusted or adjusted severities.

RESULTS

All and 72.3% of cases had their ISSs computed by our modified table and the original table, respectively. The agreement between MAN and MAP with respect to the ISS and NISS was substantial (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.939 for ISS and 0.943 for NISS). Using adjusted severities, the agreements of the ISS and NISS improved to 0.953 (p = 0.11) and 0.963 (p = 0.007), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our modified mapping table seems to allow more ISSs to be computed than the original table. Severity scores exhibited substantial agreement between MAN and MAP. The use of adjusted severities improved these agreements further.

摘要

背景

《2008年简明损伤定级标准》(AIS 2008)是最新的损伤编码系统。有一个从先前的AIS 98到AIS 2008的映射表。然而,该表中存在无法映射到AIS 2008编码的AIS 98编码。此外,一些AIS 98编码可映射到多个严重程度不同的候选AIS 2008编码。我们旨在修改原始表格以调整严重程度并验证这些更改。

方法

我们通过添加从无法映射的AIS 98编码到AIS 2008编码的链接来修改原始表格。我们将原始表格和修改后的表格应用于重大创伤患者的AIS 98编码。我们还为不同严重程度的候选编码赋予其严重程度的加权平均值作为调整后的严重程度。比较了损伤严重程度评分(ISS)可计算的病例比例。我们还比较了手动确定的AIS 2008编码(MAN)与使用我们的表格(MAP)映射的编码在未调整或调整严重程度情况下的ISS和新ISS(NISS)的一致性。

结果

分别有100%和72.3%的病例通过我们修改后的表格和原始表格计算出了ISS。MAN和MAP在ISS和NISS方面的一致性很强(组内相关系数:ISS为0.939,NISS为0.943)。使用调整后的严重程度,ISS和NISS的一致性分别提高到了0.953(p = 0.11)和0.963(p = 0.007)。

结论

我们修改后的映射表似乎比原始表格能计算出更多的ISS。严重程度评分在MAN和MAP之间表现出很强的一致性。使用调整后的严重程度进一步提高了这些一致性。

相似文献

1
Validation of a modified table to map the 1998 Abbreviated Injury Scale to the 2008 scale and the use of adjusted severities.一种用于将1998年简略损伤量表映射到2008年量表并使用调整后严重程度的改良表格的验证。
J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1829-34. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823cc5c5.
2
Abbreviated Injury Scale: not a reliable basis for summation of injury severity in trauma facilities?简略损伤量表:在创伤机构中作为损伤严重程度汇总的依据是否不可靠?
Injury. 2013 May;44(5):691-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.032. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
3
Changing to AIS 2005 and agreement of injury severity scores in a trauma registry with scores based on manual chart review.改为 AIS 2005 和基于手工图表审查的创伤登记处损伤严重程度评分的协议。
Injury. 2011 Sep;42(9):934-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.05.033. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
4
Impact of the version of the abbreviated injury scale on injury severity characterization and quality assessment of trauma care.简明损伤定级标准版本对创伤严重程度特征描述及创伤护理质量评估的影响
J Trauma. 2011 Jul;71(1):56-62. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31821e5a25.
5
Scoring of anatomic injury after trauma: AIS 98 versus AIS 90--do the changes affect overall severity assessment?创伤后解剖损伤评分:AIS 98与AIS 90——这些变化会影响总体严重程度评估吗?
Injury. 2007 Jan;38(1):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.123. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
6
Injury coding in a national trauma registry: a one-year validation audit in a level 1 trauma centre.国家创伤登记处的损伤编码:在一级创伤中心进行的为期一年的验证审核
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Oct 30;19(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0276-8.
7
Different AIS triplets: Different mortality predictions in identical ISS and NISS.不同的急性缺血性卒中三联征:相同损伤严重度评分和简明损伤严重度评分下的不同死亡率预测
J Trauma. 2006 Sep;61(3):711-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000235294.32326.e6.
8
Mapping Abbreviated Injury Scale data from 1990 to 1998 versions: a stepping-stone in the contemporary evaluation of trauma.从 1990 年到 1998 年版本的损伤严重度评分数据映射:当代创伤评估的垫脚石。
Injury. 2013 Nov;44(11):1437-42. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.033. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
9
Development of an expert based ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM map to AIS 2005 update 2008.基于专家的ICD - 9 - CM和ICD - 10 - CM到2008年更新版AIS 2005的映射开发。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Sep;17 Suppl 1:1-5. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1191069.
10
Validation of the "HAMP" mapping algorithm: a tool for long-term trauma research studies in the conversion of AIS 2005 to AIS 98.“HAMP”映射算法的验证:一种用于将AIS 2005转换为AIS 98的长期创伤研究的工具。
J Trauma. 2011 Jul;71(1):85-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181f9f873.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of injury severity scores (ISS) obtained by manual coding versus "Two-step conversion" from ICD-9-CM.手动编码与 ICD-9-CM 的“两步转换”获取的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)的比较。
PLoS One. 2019 May 1;14(5):e0216206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216206. eCollection 2019.
2
Analysis of Shahid Rajaee hospital administrative data on injuries resulting from car accidents in Shiraz, Iran: 2011-2014 data.伊朗设拉子沙希德拉贾伊医院关于2011 - 2014年车祸所致损伤的行政数据分析
Chin J Traumatol. 2017 Feb;20(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.10.006. Epub 2017 Jan 20.