• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从 1990 年到 1998 年版本的损伤严重度评分数据映射:当代创伤评估的垫脚石。

Mapping Abbreviated Injury Scale data from 1990 to 1998 versions: a stepping-stone in the contemporary evaluation of trauma.

机构信息

Trauma Service, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Injury. 2013 Nov;44(11):1437-42. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.033. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.033
PMID:22981368
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Many trauma registries have used the 1990 revision of the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS; AIS90) to code injuries sustained by trauma patients. Due to changes made to the AIS codeset since its release, AIS90-coded data lacks currency in the assessment of injury severity. The ability to map between the 1998 revision of AIS (AIS98) and the current (2008) AIS version (AIS08) already exists. The development of a map for transforming AIS90-coded data into AIS98 would therefore enable contemporary injury severity estimates to be derived from AIS90-coded data.

METHODS

Differences between the AIS90 and AIS98 codesets were identified, and AIS98 maps were generated for AIS90 codes which changed or were not present in AIS98. The effectiveness of this map in describing the severity of trauma using AIS90 and AIS98 was evaluated using a large state registry dataset, which coded injury data using AIS90 over several years. Changes in Injury Severity Scores (ISS) calculated using AIS90 and mapped AIS98 codesets were assessed using three distinct methods.

RESULTS

Forty-nine codes (out of 1312) from the AIS90 codeset changed or were not present in AIS98. Twenty-four codes required the assignment of maps to AIS98 equivalents. AIS90-coded data from 78,075 trauma cases were used to evaluate the map. Agreement in calculated ISS between coded AIS90 data and mapped AIS98 data was very high (kappa=0.971). The ISS changed in 1902 cases (2.4%), and the mean difference in ISS across all cases was 0.006 points. The number of cases classified as major trauma using AIS98 decreased by 0.8% compared with AIS90. A total of 3102 cases (4.0%) sustained at least one AIS90 injury which required mapping to AIS98.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified the differences between the AIS90 and AIS98 codesets, and generated maps for the conversion process. In practice, the differences between AIS90- and AIS98-coded data were very small. As a result, AIS90-coded data can be mapped to the current AIS version (AIS08) via AIS98, with little apparent impact on the functional accuracy of the mapped dataset produced.

摘要

简介

许多创伤登记处使用 1990 年修订的简明损伤定级标准(AIS;AIS90)对创伤患者的损伤进行编码。由于自发布以来 AIS 编码集发生了变化,因此 AIS90 编码数据在评估损伤严重程度方面已经过时。AIS98 与当前(2008 年)AIS 版本(AIS08)之间的映射能力已经存在。因此,开发一种将 AIS90 编码数据转换为 AIS98 的映射将使能够从 AIS90 编码数据中得出当代损伤严重程度的估计值。

方法

确定了 AIS90 和 AIS98 编码集之间的差异,并为 AIS90 代码生成了 AIS98 映射,这些代码在 AIS98 中发生了变化或不存在。使用大型州登记数据集评估了该映射在使用 AIS90 和 AIS98 描述创伤严重程度方面的有效性,该数据集在几年内使用 AIS90 对损伤数据进行了编码。使用三种不同的方法评估使用 AIS90 和映射 AIS98 编码集计算得出的伤害严重程度评分(ISS)的变化。

结果

AIS90 编码集中有 49 个代码(占 1312 个)发生了变化或不存在于 AIS98 中。有 24 个代码需要分配 AIS98 等效代码。使用来自 78075 例创伤病例的 AIS90 编码数据来评估该映射。编码 AIS90 数据与映射 AIS98 数据之间计算得出的 ISS 非常吻合(kappa=0.971)。ISS 在 1902 例病例中发生变化(2.4%),所有病例中 ISS 的平均差异为 0.006 分。使用 AIS98 分类为重大创伤的病例数比 AIS90 减少了 0.8%。共有 3102 例(4.0%)至少有一处需要映射到 AIS98 的 AIS90 损伤。

结论

本研究确定了 AIS90 和 AIS98 编码集之间的差异,并为转换过程生成了映射。实际上,AIS90 和 AIS98 编码数据之间的差异非常小。因此,AIS90 编码数据可以通过 AIS98 映射到当前的 AIS 版本(AIS08),对生成的映射数据集的功能准确性几乎没有明显影响。

相似文献

1
Mapping Abbreviated Injury Scale data from 1990 to 1998 versions: a stepping-stone in the contemporary evaluation of trauma.从 1990 年到 1998 年版本的损伤严重度评分数据映射:当代创伤评估的垫脚石。
Injury. 2013 Nov;44(11):1437-42. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.033. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
2
Assessment of the effects and limitations of the 1998 to 2008 Abbreviated Injury Scale map using a large population-based dataset.利用大型基于人群的数据集评估 1998 年至 2008 年简略损伤量表图的效果和局限性。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 Jan 7;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-1.
3
Development and validation of a complementary map to enhance the existing 1998 to 2008 Abbreviated Injury Scale map.开发和验证补充映射以增强现有的 1998 年至 2008 年简略损伤量表图。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 May 8;19:29. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-29.
4
Defining major trauma using the 2008 Abbreviated Injury Scale.使用2008年简明损伤分级标准定义严重创伤。
Injury. 2016 Jan;47(1):109-15. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
5
Changing to AIS 2005 and agreement of injury severity scores in a trauma registry with scores based on manual chart review.改为 AIS 2005 和基于手工图表审查的创伤登记处损伤严重程度评分的协议。
Injury. 2011 Sep;42(9):934-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.05.033. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
6
Abbreviated Injury Scale: not a reliable basis for summation of injury severity in trauma facilities?简略损伤量表:在创伤机构中作为损伤严重程度汇总的依据是否不可靠?
Injury. 2013 May;44(5):691-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.032. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
7
Impact of Adapting the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)-2005 from AIS-1998 on Injury Severity Scores and Clinical Outcome.适应 AIS-2005 对伤害严重程度评分和临床结果的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 10;16(24):5033. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245033.
8
Inclusion of 'minor' trauma cases provides a better estimate of the total burden of injury: Queensland Trauma Registry provides a unique perspective.纳入“轻微”创伤病例能更准确地估计损伤的总体负担:昆士兰创伤登记处提供了独特视角。
Injury. 2014 Aug;45(8):1236-41. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.03.023. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
9
Scoring of anatomic injury after trauma: AIS 98 versus AIS 90--do the changes affect overall severity assessment?创伤后解剖损伤评分:AIS 98与AIS 90——这些变化会影响总体严重程度评估吗?
Injury. 2007 Jan;38(1):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.123. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
10
Validation of a modified table to map the 1998 Abbreviated Injury Scale to the 2008 scale and the use of adjusted severities.一种用于将1998年简略损伤量表映射到2008年量表并使用调整后严重程度的改良表格的验证。
J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1829-34. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823cc5c5.

引用本文的文献

1
Coding traumatic brain injury with the abbreviated injury scale following a standardised radiologic template will improve classification of trauma populations.按照标准化放射学模板使用简明损伤定级法对创伤性脑损伤进行编码,将改善创伤人群的分类。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11384-9.
2
Analysis of factors influencing the surgical treatment outcomes of spinal injuries in polytrauma patients.多发伤患者脊柱损伤手术治疗效果的影响因素分析
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Oct 28;86(12):6960-6967. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002704. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Chest wall reconstruction reduces hospital mortality following major chest wall trauma: a retrospective cohort study.
胸壁重建可降低大型胸壁创伤后的院内死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Jul;105(6):489-500. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0155. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
4
Inter-rater reliability of the Abbreviated Injury Scale scores in patients with severe head injury shows good inter-rater agreement but variability between countries. An inter-country comparison study.严重头部损伤患者损伤严重程度分类评分的观察者间信度显示出较好的观察者间一致性,但国家间存在差异。一项国家间比较研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Jun;49(3):1183-1188. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02059-x. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
5
Predicting Outcomes of Penetrating Cardiovascular Injuries at a Rural Center by Different Scoring Systems.通过不同评分系统预测农村中心穿透性心血管损伤的结局
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Apr 1;35(2):198-205. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0403.
6
Predictors of clavicle fixation in multiply injured patients.多发伤患者锁骨固定的预测因素
J Orthop. 2020 Feb 4;21:35-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.02.001. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.
7
Club cell protein 16 in sera from trauma patients modulates neutrophil migration and functionality via CXCR1 and CXCR2.创伤患者血清中的克拉细胞蛋白 16 通过 CXCR1 和 CXCR2 调节中性粒细胞的迁移和功能。
Mol Med. 2019 Oct 30;25(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s10020-019-0115-0.
8
Reduced NLRP3 Gene Expression Limits the IL-1 Cleavage via Inflammasome in Monocytes from Severely Injured Trauma Patients.严重创伤患者单核细胞中 NLRP3 基因表达减少限制了白细胞介素-1 的切割。
Mediators Inflamm. 2018 May 9;2018:1752836. doi: 10.1155/2018/1752836. eCollection 2018.